Ok, so I'm horribly biased, but if ODE-580 & ODE-576 (neither one of which appears on list 3 as they don't have a Fix/Versions set) were able to make it into 1.3.1 I'd actually be able to use that release ;) (Without them I lose memory on long running executions and they do currently have patches against them to resolve these leaks)
(Obviously I appreciate the name of the game is *Reducing* the set of all things going into 1.3.1, but it would be nice to get a version out with no memory leaks ? :) Sry! - Cj. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Matthieu Riou <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Alexis Midon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > we currently have 119 closed or resolved issues [1], I think it's time we > > prepare a release of the 1.X branch, that would be the release 1.3.1. > > Before going further we need to do some trillage in the jira issues i.e. > > closing the resolved issues [2], moving the opened issues [3] to the next > > version, 1.3.2. In this process your help would be appreciated for the > > issues you're familiar with. > > > > Of course, feel free to speak up if you have concerns, objections, > > blockers, > > etc > > > > Thanks a lot for taking over the release :) > > > > > > Alexis > > > > [1] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310270&status=5&status=6&fixfor=12313680&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=summary&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=status&sorter/order=DESC > > [2] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310270&status=5&fixfor=12313680&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > [3] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310270&status=1&status=3&status=4&fixfor=12313680&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > >
