Re: User Login in set up, Minimum permission requirement

[David E. Jones]

-David


On Jan 13, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Anil Patel wrote:

Yeah, like Scott said it's probably the OFBTOOLS permission you're missing. The idea behind that permission is to have one that's required for all of the stock OFBiz applications so that it is easy to setup users that don't have this permission to only access your custom apps and such.

Scott,
Thanks for your quick response. I'll be able to find my way from here.

Regards
Anil Patel

On 1/13/07, Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

time.  The first message should say WORKEFFORTMGR and not WORKEFFORT

On 14/01/07, Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Anil
>
> The required base-permissions are defined in each component's

> "WORKEFFORTMGR" and is only allowing "OFBTOOLS".
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> Anil Patel wrote:
> > Hi,

of

make
> > sure I am making mistakes in testing. But got stuck in process of
> > creating
> > meaning full user login id.
> >

is
> > Enabled,
> >
> > Created a new Security Group "SECDEV" gave following permission
> >
> > [WORKEFFORTMGR_ADMIN] ALL operations in the Work Effort Manager.
> >     [WORKEFFORTMGR_UPDATE] Update operations in the Work Effort
Manager.
> >     [WORKEFFORTMGR_VIEW]
> >
> >
> > When I tried to login in ofbiz, I get following error.

> > missing).
> >

> > success. Can somebody help me in with this!
> >
> > Regards
> > Anil Patel
> >
>
>

Sorry about the double send, I thought I had cancelled the first one in > ofbiz-component.xml, workeffort seems to be missing it's base permission > > In the process of testing the new security implementation, I thought > > creating a new user login and assign permissions from ground up. To > > I created a new user login "testsecurity" pwd "veryhard". user login > > Login for this application couldn't be completed (required permissions > > I looked around to find some documentation on this but didn't get much

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature