Jonathon,

When I said that my client WILL need this functionality, that means my
client hasn't yet committed to using OFBiz. So my time, at the moment is
wasted keeping his MS Access project alive.

I can certainly help a bit with testing, but haste is not required at the
moment, but I think it's great that you have so much energy and enthusiasm.
Once I can get the go-ahead from my client, I shall be quite active.

So let us know what you propose and we can all contribute ideas as to how it
should be done for the benefit of the OFBiz community at large.

Kind regards,

Andrew Ballantine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 January 2007 13:37
To: [email protected]
Cc: Tom Anderson; Ian McNulty
Subject: Re: Purchasing services to process components, and receiving
processed components


Andrew,

Wait a sec! Ie, hear me out. :)

OFBiz does cater for this in the database end of things.

My boss needs it; you need it. If you're willing to work with me on this
(even something simple as
help with user-testing and complaining), I'm sure I can get this up within a
couple of days, or
less. Meaning, "right away".

How about that?

Jonathon

Andrew Ballantine wrote:
> Jonathon,
>
> My client is going to need this type of off-site production.
>
> I thought OFBiz already catered for this.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Andrew Ballantine.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 January 2007 08:00
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Tom Anderson
> Subject: Re: Purchasing services to process components, and receiving
> processed components
>
>
> Chris,
>
> I've confirmed that OFBiz doesn't do anything near as complicated as what
I
> described below (in
> 1st post in thread). (Even the routing task type of Sub-contracting
doesn't
> do anything?).
>
> I'd like to ask the community for advice of "best practices" before I
submit
> an enhancement. How
> would you usually go about:
>
> 1. Starting production run.
>
> 2. Task1: Produce some parts.
>
> 3. Task2: Ship parts to vendor for painting.
>
> 4. Task3: Assemble painted parts.
>
> For Task2 (step 3 above), I'm proposing we have a PO for the painting
> service, complete with a
> link from PO to routing task, an outgoing shipment of pre-painted parts,
and
> an incoming shipment
> of painted parts.
>
> Has anyone done this yet (not merged into OFBiz)? Is it something that a
> sizable majority of the
> community would need? How would such a majority propose I do the above?
>
> TIA for inputs!
>
> Jonathon
>
> Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> Yeah, I read that. Nothing on what I'm talking about here.
>>
>> Let me try to get the requirements streamlined or simplified, and see if
>> OFBiz can handle then.
>>
>> Jonathon
>>
>> Chris Howe wrote:
>>> I don't do any manufacturing in my day to day stuff so
>>> this may not fit your bill exactly, but have you read
>>> over this:
>>>
>>> http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=Manufacturing
>>> ?
>>>
>>> --- Jonathon -- Improov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Say I want to send some parts over to a vendor for
>>>> painting services.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Create a product of type "service" named
>>>> PAINTING,
>>>>
>>>> 2. Create a PO to purchase this service,
>>>>
>>>> 3. Attach to this PO an outgoing shipment ferrying
>>>> my parts to my vendor,
>>>>
>>>> 4. Receive the PO and have my painted parts in my
>>>> inventory rather than the
>>>>     product PAINTING.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried product associations like "Product
>>>> Manufactured As", "New Version, Replacement" and "Equivalent or
>>>> Substitute". Tried associations in
>>>> both directions. No go.
>>>>
>>>> I can't "manufacture" PAINTING to produce the
>>>> painted parts. Nor can I purchase PAINTING to receive the painted
parts.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Jonathon
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007
> 03:36
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007
> 03:36
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007
> 03:36
>
>
>
> *****************************************************************
> This email has been checked by the altohiway Mailcontroller Service
> *****************************************************************
>
>



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007
03:36


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007
03:36

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.6/646 - Release Date: 23/01/2007
03:36

Reply via email to