John,
> It appears that there was an attempt at a cross reference table for WE and
> Orders being the orderHeaderWorkEffort but searching the code, it looks as
> though only the createOrderHeaderWorkEffort service was created but not
> used. This doesn't appear to be being used. This solution doesn't look to
> me as being the best way since we don't want to have dozens of tables just
> to relate WE to different tables.
I posted something on this before. Search the posts around early to mid Jan 07?
Entity OrderHeaderWorkEffort doesn't seem to used, I think. I left it at that because I was more
interested in WorkOrderItemFulfillment because I needed to link individual OrderItem(s) in an
Order to individual production runs.
I don't quite understand your generic reference table. Where do we specify which table is linked
to a WorkEffort record?
IMO, we shouldn't create such generic reference tables unless we're seeing an organized concerted
change in the framework to deal with something we might call "WorkEffort framework", where such a
framework would link any (any? really?) table rows with WorkEffort rows in a robust and
integrity-safe way. The whole idea sounds very open-ended, probably too big for me to wrap my mind
around.
Jonathon
John Martin wrote:
Noboby has posted a response to my original question so I guess just
thinking outloud. Anyways I'm still looking for the correct solution.
I checked the code base and see no reference to the universalId being used.
It appears however that the sourceReferenceId is used in at least one case
to reference orderId so I'm assuming that might be what I should be doing?
Using sourceReferenceId though might not always be the best option since it
is not normalized therefore can only be associated to one other object. In
addition, there is no way to indicate the type or purpose of the
relationship if one so chose. The workEffortAttribute looks like it would
allow for an association but there is not key field (vchar 20) to do joins
on nor does it include a type or purpose attribute.
It appears that there was an attempt at a cross reference table for WE and
Orders being the orderHeaderWorkEffort but searching the code, it looks as
though only the createOrderHeaderWorkEffort service was created but not
used. This doesn't appear to be being used. This solution doesn't look to
me as being the best way since we don't want to have dozens of tables just
to relate WE to different tables.
Would it make sense to have a table (ie work_effort_reference) that could
relate WEs to other tables similar to work_effort_attribute? I haven't
noticed any similar pattern in the data model and would be interested in
some feedback. One concern with what I'm proposing is that using a generic
cross reference table would not support referential integrity. This
concern
however has already been breached by the
workEffort.sourceReferenceIdreferencing orders.
What I'm considering is a table:
work_effort_reference
work_effort_reference_id type="id-ne"
reference_name type="id-long-ne"
reference_id type="id-ne"
last updated_stamp/tx_stamp
created_stamp/tx_stamp
A purpose could be added but I don't have a requirement at this point. One
could argue why not make the reference table completely generic and have
reference_name_to/from and reference_id_to/from and thereby allow any
associate between two tables to be persisted.
Any comments?
Thanks,
John
On 1/25/07, John Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out the best way to integrate an application with
the
Work Effort (WE) module. I need to keep track of different tasks as
events
occur in the application and believe that WE can do exactly what I need.
The question that I have is that I don't understand/see how a WE is
associated to an object ( i.e. order, item, etc). In my situation, we
are
posting items to eBay in a scheduled job and if the listing fails, I
want to
create a work effort to indicate that the item needs to be reviewed and
relisted. I would like to record the reason that the posting failed as
well.
I can see that the description would work for the failure reason but I
don't know how to associate the auction id to the WE. Is the
universalId or
sourceReferenceId the appropriate place to store references to other
entities?
Thanks,
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.14/658 - Release Date: 1/29/2007 2:49
PM
