Ian,

For RSI in mouse arm. Did you ever try to use both arms alternatively
(by days or hours) ? Balance is a zen way...
Use of softwares like Workpace (Windows) or Workrave may be interesting
too.

One more time : thanks for your brave work !

Jacques

----- Message d'origine ----- 
De : "Ian McNulty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : <[email protected]>
Envoyé : mercredi 7 mars 2007 14:17
Objet : Re: Migration of Manager Ref PDFs to Wiki Format


> Hi Scott,
>
> Your message arrived at last! Many thanks.
>
> Yes it was very laborious work. Getting on for a hundred hours in
total
> if you include finding the right software for the conversion,
> researching the extent of the currently existing fragments in the
Wiki,
> learning the Wiki markup etc. And not great for the RSI in my mouse
arm
> either. A dirty job, but somebody had to to it ;)
>
> I really am a bit reluctant to comment any more than I already have on
> the current content of the docs. As far as I understand it, they were
> written by a professional technical writer (which I certainly am not)
> and cost something like $40,000 to produce, so they are of
considerable
> value as they stand. I treated them as such, and made every effort not
> to drop even one single word.
>
> As for developing them further, I'm afraid this is way out of my
league.
> Two months after installing OFBiz, I still don't feel confident I know
> how to work it myself, let alone teach anybody else.
>
> I originally started translating the PDFs into editable format with
the
> aim of re-jigging them into something that I or any of my clients
might
> be able to use. But after more than a week's work I eventually had to
> admit defeat and decided simply to translate them as they stood in the
> hope that others might succeed where I had failed. So any further
> development of this material really would need to be done by anybody
> else except me.
>
> I appreciate your offer of help in answering any questions I might hav
e,
> but there are so many that answering them all would probably mean
having
> to write an entire User's Manual yourself, which would kindof defeat
the
> purpose of the exercise!
>
> That said, your thanks are appreciated. I just hope that these docs
can
> now be developed into something useful and that I have been able to
make
> some kind of contribution towards the further development of the OFBiz
> end-user community.
>
> Best,
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
> > Hi Ian
> >
> > I believe these will eventually end up in the End-User docs section
> > that you mention below, but I wouldn't recommend moving them there
> > until any major revisions have been completed.
> > How do you (and anyone else reading) feel about the current content
of
> > the docs?  If you or anyone else has time to contribute to them
> > further then that should take place on the wiki for now, and once
any
> > efforts to improve them have slowed down, they could then be moved
> > over to the OFBENDUSER space to protect the work that has been done.
> > I'd be happy to try and answer any questions you might have if you
> > decide to work on this further (and I'm sure others would too).
> >
> > Personally I think you've done a great job migrating the docs and I
> > can guess how laborious the task must have been (I gave it a go
myself
> > at one point).
> >
> > Thanks
> > Scott
> >
> > Ian McNulty wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I posted news of this a couple of days ago but put it in the
General
> >> questions thread by mistake, so thought I ought to try again on a
new
> >> thread.
> >>
> >> I've now finished migrating the complete set of Undersun Manager
> >> Reference PDFs to Wiki format.
> >>
> >> I couldn't get access to the OFBiz End-User Documentation section
so
> >> was advised by Jacopo to put them under my Confluence Home page at:
> >>
> >>
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Manager+References
> >>
> >> Is this where they should stay, or do they now need be moved into a
> >> public section of the Wiki where they can be amended and refined by
> >> others as the project develops?
> >>
> >> Ian
> >>
> >
> >

Reply via email to