Hi Florin,

I think the following link shows clearly how you can use various open
source licenses.

http://developer.kde.org/documentation/licensing/licenses_summary.html

enjoy

--- Florin Jurcovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> IMO that's not necessarily the best wasy to go - although I respect
> your  
> freedom of choice.
> 
> Why do I thik otherwise? Since the HPL is a modified GPL that only  
> requires openness more precisely than the GPL - I could not see any  
> restriction in a spirit different than that of the GPL. So no matter
> if  
> you go with ofbiz core or with opentaps, IMO you are bound to
> essentially  
> the same contract. If you later on decide to develop and market a
> product  
> based on ofbiz or opentaps, and keep it closed-source, you're stuck,
> no  
> matter if you built your custom, marketable solution on opentaps or
> ofbiz.  
> If later on you decide to publish your custom solution as open-source
>  
> additions to ofbiz - or opentaps - you're essentially going to do it
> the  
> same way for both of them.
> 
> There is another license, which allows you to build a custom solution
>  
> based on open source: LGPL. However, neither ofbiz core nor opentaps
> are  
> licensed under its terms. As such, you have to either keep your
> custom  
> solution closed source and use it only internally, or you have to
> publish  
> it as open source. So essentially there is no way you could make
> money  
>  from selling licenses of stuff built on top of either ofbiz or
> opentaps.
> 
> The only thing you' achieve by duplicating the functionality
> available in  
> opentaps and not available in ofbiz is duplication of effort, IMO. At
>  
> least that's my understanding.
> 
> Please, anybody, if my understanding of the licensing problems is
> buggy,  
> correct me. The licensing issues are important for me too.
> 
> br,
> 
> -- 
> Florin Jurcovici
> ------------------
> Why do psychics have to ask you for your name?
> 
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:53:28 +0300, Scott A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > I guess this thread really illustrates the confusion that I had  
> > originally. I
> > didnt want to start any problems but I just want the ability to do 
> 
> > whatever
> > I want with the software that I help to develop. Who knows where
> the  
> > future
> > leads and what we may or may not do with the software down the
> road. It's
> > especially true for speciality operations that need to do much
> > customization. You might find in 5 years time that your software is
> worth
> > more than your product... That would be a real bad time to find out
> that  
> > the
> > license was different from what you had thought.
> >
> > I'm just going to stick with the core of ofbiz and over time I'll
> build  
> > the
> > extra functionality that I want and need.
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to