Jacopo,

Obviously I'm a +1 for the trunk, but it is important to note that even if
this doesn't go into 4.0 something similar will need to be implemented so
that invoice item tax can be displayed to 3 decimal places.  For the record
I would prefer it if this went into 4.0 as well

Regards
Scott

On 21/05/07, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

David, Scott, all,

is it ok to commit Scott's patch only in the trunk (not in the release
branch) as a temporary change to help us to figure out all the areas
where rounding needs to be fixes?

Jacopo

David E Jones wrote:
>
> It's a good point... we shouldn't need to round in the UI because what
> is underneath should have things rounded in advance.
>
> What do others think? Should we display full values everywhere, or
> selectively, or perhaps just in the Entity Data Maint stuff in WebTools,
> or something else?
>
> -David
>
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Hi David
>>
>> The reason I wanted to do get rid of the ui performing any rounding
>> was that
>> I couldn't see why it was necessary when it is the responsibility of
the
>> logic supplying the numbers to make sure they are correct in the first
>> place.
>>
>> If for some strange reason an order total is being worked out to
>> $97.3459 do
>> we want the ui to hide that from us?
>>
>> Initially I created a patch to allow us to specify the decimal places
>> using
>> ofbizCurrencyTransform in ftl's (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-939) but then I started
>> wondering why we need the ui to do any rounding for us.
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 09/05/07, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we really want to commit this patch, and have OFBiz display all
>>> currency values with 10 decimal figures?
>>>
>>> My opinion is: definitely no.
>>>
>>> If we want to display more decimal digits in certain places we should
>>> add
>>> an optional attribute/parameter to the transform and then specify it
>>> explicitly in certain spots, like 3 or 4 or based on db data number of
>>> digits.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>> > I've committed the changes in rev. 535415
>>> >
>>> > As I mentioned above, someone with framework commit privileges
>>> needs to
>>> > look at the rounding of displayed currency.  I've attached a patch
>>> with
>>> > the changes I think are needed.  If it doesn't see any action in the
>>> > short term I'll throw it in the jira.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Scott
>>> >
>>> > On 05/05/07, *Scott Gray* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     I had planned on working the patch in this weekend, I just need
to
>>> >     clean it up a bit.
>>> >
>>> >     One thing I need a framework guy to look at is the rounding
>>> currency
>>> >     formatting in widgets and the freemarker transform, I think we
>>> need
>>> >     to set the default to something like 10 decimal places instead
of
>>> >     the currency's default.  That way any rounding problems aren't
>>> >     hidden by the display code and it also allows us to display tax
>>> >     items to 3 decimal places (or whatever the
>>> arithmetic.properties has
>>> >     set).
>>> >
>>> >     Also, salestax.calc.decimals is a bit of misnomer considering
the
>>> >     best we can do when storing intermediate tax is
>>> currency-precise at
>>> >     3 decimal places.
>>> >
>>> >     And yes I did get paid (tax free, for the moment at least) :-)
>>> >
>>> >     Regards
>>> >     Scott
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     On 05/05/07, *Jacopo Cappellato* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >         Yes,
>>> >
>>> >         and, Scott, did you get your 500$ ? :-)
>>> >
>>> >         Jacopo
>>> >
>>> >         David E Jones wrote:
>>> >         >
>>> >         >  Scott,
>>> >         >
>>> >         >  Did this ever make it into OFBiz? I only reviewed it
>>> briefly,
>>> >         but if it
>>> >         >  is fixing this problem then it would be great to have it
in
>>> >         the ofbiz
>>> >         >  trunk.
>>> >         >
>>> >         >  -David
>>> >         >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>



Reply via email to