Skip,
"A lot of work" meaning it's largely unimplemented? I don't see a lot of operations dealing with
FinAccount (unless I'm not looking in the right places).
I had recently done some work in these areas (PaymentGatewayServices and such). Let me know if you
want me to throw together something quick, RFC or patch or whatever.
Jonathon
Skip wrote:
Rashko
I have been hashing this out with Si, etc. myself now for some weeks and the
consensus as I see it is to use FinAccount and related entities. But, this
is a lot of work.
Skip
-----Original Message-----
From: Rashko Rejmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 6:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Order payed with few billing accounts
Hi all,
I wanted to ask the community for opinion about ability orders/invoices to
be payed with multiple billing accounts. I research the ml and jira and
found that there are different points of view on this
topic(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-682).
Now I have to implement ability to pay order with more then one billing
accounts and to be able to create invoice from orders that are payed with
different billing accounts.
Now I have to implement ability to pay order with more then one billing
accounts and to be able to create invoice from orders that are payed with
different billing accounts.
Personally, I am inclined to agree with Si's opinion that it is be better if
billingAccountId field is located at OrderPaymentPreference entity to
achieve this ability.
I was wondering what are the disadvantages of this idea. I will be happy if
you share your opinion on this with me.
Regards,
Rashko Rejmer
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Order-payed-with-few-billing-accounts-tf4466514.html#a
12735296
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
