Carl,
thanks! :)
Atenciosamente,
Matheus Eduardo Machado Moreira
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
Salvor Hardin (The Foundation, Isaac Asimov)
2007/10/31, Carl Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Matheus,
>
> Yes, you are able to use WebTools running only the components in the
> framework folder. One easy way to solve the issue of the UiLabel
> dependency
> from securityext is to simply move the SecurityextUiLabels.properties(right
> filename is it?) into framework/security. I think that since the framework
> uses these labels they should be in the framework folder so this problem
> won't come up again.
>
>
> Matheus Eduardo Machado Moreira-3 wrote:
> >
> > I'm running into the same problem here (framework not able to find
> > SecurityextUiLabels), so I cannot log in into Webtools application. I'd
> > like
> > to use Webtools to manage my entities while I develop my application. I
> > didn't delete the applications and specialpurpose folders yet but I
> > changed
> > the build and component-load files to avoid building and loading these
> > undesired applications.
> >
> > Am I able to use Web Tools application loading only the framework
> > components? If not, what is the minimum set of applications necessary to
> > do
> > it?
> >
> > Atenciosamente,
> >
> > Matheus Eduardo Machado Moreira
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
> > Salvor Hardin (The Foundation, Isaac Asimov)
> >
> > 2007/10/28, Carl Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >>
> >> David,
> >>
> >> I have been using 4.0 now using only the framework. Everything worked
> >> fine
> >> until I switched db. Moving from the derby caused problems. Trying to
> >> login
> >> you get "SecuirtyextUiLabels not found for locale" since
> >> LoginServices.java
> >> uses those resources. I suppose this has to do with new database not
> >> having
> >> any userlogins (since they're not imported when they're in securityext)
> >> and
> >> then trying to get the ui labels but does not find them. Is it supposed
> >> to
> >> be this way?
> >>
> >>
> >> David E Jones wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Carl Johansson wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I have tried naked 4.0 and it works well for me. However it would
> >> >> be great to
> >> >> have partymgr and securityext for logins. Am I wrong about this? If
> >> >> not, is
> >> >> anyone else interested in this aswell?
> >> >
> >> > Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? The UserLogin
> >> > entity is in the framework and should work fine without the party and
> >> > securityext components.
> >> >
> >> > If you want the partymgr you're opening a whole can of worms, as
> >> > there is a lot in it and it isn't designed to be used independent of
> >> > the other applications components. It can certainly be isolated, but
> >> > I'd be very surprised if it was worth the effort.
> >> >
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> David E Jones wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Just delete the entire applications folder (and you can delete the
> >> >>> specialpurpose folder as well).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I haven't tested this in a while, but it should still work without
> >> >>> problems unless a new framework -> applications dependency has
> >> >>> slipped in (which is a big NO NO!).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -David
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13451525
> >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13503697
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
