BJ - your question is not ignorant, but I have no idea how to answer. We'll 
have to depend on others in the community much smarter than us. 

Entity Sync is a feature available in the system. We are using it and I can 
only assume that it works if configured properly. I have figured out the basics 
of push and pull synchronization. That is about as much intelligence as I can 
claim. 

I can get into the details of what I loaded and where if necessary, such as 
EnityGroup, EnittySync, RecurrenceRule, etc. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 4:35:09 PM (GMT-0700) America/Denver 
Subject: Re: Strange behavior with Entity Sync 

ignorant question 
does not entity sync mess up the accounting. 
how are the ecas that are suppose to fire based on certain services, 
that do CRUD of the entity suppose to fire? 

am I missing some documentation on how this works? 


Vince M. Clark sent the following on 12/6/2007 1:58 PM: 
> We are using entity sync to keep POS terminals and a central server 
> synchronized. We are going direct from POS to MCS, no Per Store Server 
> involved. We have a pull sync (MCS to POS) and a push sync (POS to MCS.) Some 
> data such as inventory is going both ways. 
> 
> A few issues: 
> 1) Records deleted on MCS are not deleted on POS. 
> 2) Pull sync is not getting complete records in some cases. Two entities we 
> see this consistenly is on Facility and InventoryItem. We get partial records 
> sometimes. Note that this only seems to occur on the initial pull when we are 
> first populating a new POS terminal from the central server. Once we identify 
> a record, such as a facility, that didn't come down completely we can update 
> the timestamp on the server and the next pull gets the complete record. 
> 3) Related to item 2. If a push occurs from the POS terminal BEFORE we get 
> the initial data correct, it overwrites the data on MCS. For example, if a 
> facility record was pulled down and the store id is missing then when the 
> terminal push occurs it trashes the facility record on the server. Strange 
> thing is we aren't pushing facility data, only pulling. 
> 
> Note that the server time is different than the terminals (different 
> timezones.) 
> 
> Vince Clark 
> Global Era 
> The Freedom of Open Source 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> (303) 493-6723 
> 

Reply via email to