that is considered a enhacement
if you take it out of the service then you much change all the call that
service.
however those in power may decide to do it anyway.

Case Torres sent the following on 1/11/2008 3:23 PM:
> But there is not a note id field in the trunk version.
> 
> Case Torres
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:16 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Creating party_note, note_id error
>>that
>> no,
>> if it is null it will autosign a ID
>> but leave the ability to assign an  ID.
>> I would put a jira in for the 25 char display on the widget 
>> but 20 char for the ID not sure where the bug is.
>>
>>
>> Case Torres sent the following on 1/11/2008 2:46 PM:
>>> I guess I'll just comment out the note_id field in the form.
>>> But this field should be eliminated from the from in the Release 4 
>>> version, no?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Case
>>>
>>> Case Torres
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:49 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: RE: Creating party_note, note_id error
>>>>
>>>> Case
>>>>
>>>> I looked at this a while ago and as I recall, the noteid 
>> is created 
>>>> for you if you pass null.  I seem to remember submitting a 
>> jira which 
>>>> removed the notid field from the UI so this happens.
>>>>
>>>> Skip
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Case Torres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:08 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Creating party_note, note_id error
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Release 4, version: 602199
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to create a note for a party in party manager and 
>>>> received the error below.
>>>> The two fields to be filled in are "Note Id" and "Note".
>>>> The Note Id form field is 25 chars long, with no max set but the 
>>>> database field is set at 20 chars so the user gets an ugly 
>> sql error 
>>>> message.
>>>> It seems the easiest fix is to make the form field max 20 
>> chars but 
>>>> I'm not sure how to do this given the following form code.
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions??? Thanks, Case
>>>>
>>>> <form name="AddPartyNote" type="single" target="createPartyNote"
>>>> focus-field-name="noteId">
>>>>         <auto-fields-service service-name="createPartyNote"/>
>>>>         <field name="partyId"><hidden/></field>
>>>>         <field name="note"><textarea cols="70" rows="10"/></field>
>>>>         <field name="submitButton" title="${uiLabelMap.CommonSave}"
>>>> widget-style="smallSubmit"><submit 
>> button-type="text-link"/></field>
>>>>         <field name="cancelLink" title=""
>>>> widget-style="smallSubmit"><hyperlink
>>>> target="${donePage}?partyId=${partyId}" also-hidden="false"
>>>> description="${uiLabelMap.CommonCancelDone}"/></field>
>>>>     </form>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>> SQL ERROR:
>>>>
>>>> Problem associating note with party "Exception while inserting the 
>>>> following
>>>> entity: [GenericEntity:PartyNote][createdStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.774(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.773(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.774(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.773(java.sql.Timestamp)][noteId,New product 
>>>>
>> discussion(java.lang.String)][partyId,12692(java.lang.String)] (while
>>>> inserting: [GenericEntity:PartyNote][createdStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.774(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.773(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.774(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2008-01-10
>>>> 13:07:25.773(java.sql.Timestamp)][noteId,New product 
>>>> discussion(java.lang.String)][partyId,12692(java.lang.String)]
>>>>  (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO 
>>>> public.PARTY_NOTE (PARTY_ID, NOTE_ID, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, 
>>>> LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) 
>> VALUES (?, ?, 
>>>> ?, ?, ?, ?) (ERROR: value too long for type character 
>>>> varying(20))))".
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1210 - Release
>>>> Date: 1/5/2008
>>>> 11:46 AM
>>>>
>>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1210 - Release
>>>> Date: 1/5/2008
>>>> 11:46 AM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to