What rev are you running. When I ran into this error I changed 
HttpClientException.java and set trustAny=true. After I changed that I noticed 
that the same change was also committed to trunk. This was a couple of months 
ago. If you want to keep the trusted cert restriction you will need to go thru 
the steps on the docs site to generate your own cert and add it to your 
keystore. I think that information is in the technical production setup guide. 
I don't think it is absolutely necessary to have the cert signed by an 
authority but I'm just a hack on this topic, not an expert. 

Vince Clark 
Global Era 
The Freedom of Open Source 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(303) 493-6723 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "JohnBrown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:09:38 AM (GMT-0700) America/Denver 
Subject: Re: POS and Authorize.net error 


Hi Vince, 

Had you any luck to get it working with signed CA there after? Please, let 
me know how it has ended up. Thanks. 


Vince Clark wrote: 
> 
> Here is what I have found. The trusted certificate error comes from 
> HttpClient.java/HttpClientException.java. 
> 
> In HttpClient.java I changed trustAny from trustAny=false to 
> trustAny=true. 
> 
> This gets us by for testing with Authorize.net test servers. Not sure if 
> it will fly in production without a "trusted" certificate, or whether that 
> cert must be signed by a CA. Anyone? 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:59:21 PM (GMT-0700) America/Denver 
> Subject: Re: POS and Authorize.net error 
> 
> Oh the ver 4.0 has the cvv code but the trunk does not. 
> 
> 
> BJ Freeman sent the following on 11/27/2007 3:57 PM: 
>> there are differences between the one in the ver 4.0 and trunk 
>> both were updated about the same day. . 
>> the trunk one checks further to see if the test property is null 
>> if it is then it returns test is true. 
>> where ver 4.0 looks only for a TRUE to mark it as a test. 
>> if null will allow the processes to run as non test. 
>> 
>> David E Jones sent the following on 11/27/2007 2:58 PM: 
>>> On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Vince M. Clark wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> No. Once I realized I had a cert issue I started reading up on related 
>>>> ML postings and the Technical Production Setup Guide. 
>>>> 
>>>> In the past we were running on OpenTaps when we setup Authorize.net. I 
>>>> guess all the SSL config is already done for you in Open Taps because 
>>>> we never had to mess with it. 
>>> Actually I think this is a new feature, and one recently required by 
>>> Authorize.net because they had some cut-off date after which they would 
>>> not process transactions without an encrypted connection. 
>>> 
>>> -David 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/POS-and-Authorize.net-error-tp13926360p15612168.html 
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 

Reply via email to