Ha, yeah, I see : testing...
Jacques
Hi Tim,
This is only on eCommerce isn'it ?
Jacques
From: "Tim Ruppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is actually not in SVN - this is a deployment feature. We'll
look into something into SVN sometime soon - this was a quickie to get
the info out there.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 8, 2008, at 4:07 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
has this been committed to the svn?
Tim Ruppert sent the following on 3/8/2008 12:58 PM:
This is complete on demo40 and will be happening with demo sometime
this
afternoon.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 8, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
FYI - the demo40 instance is the one this is being tested on so
it'll
be going up and down for a bit this afternoon.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 8, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Thanks Bruno - I was just doing it real quickly to have a version
number directly in there instead of a link. It'll be up in just a
bit. We can look at 1700 to see if this is a better long term
solution.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 8, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Please give a look to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1700
may be it could help.
Bruno
2008/3/8, Tim Ruppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Just so you know Vikas, these sites are updated nightly in the
middle
of the night US time. You could've gotten another update that
caused
an issue on this, or the demo site could've been in an odd
state just
because of the time of the checkout, etc. Many things could've
caused
this discrepancy.
As far as the version numbers - I think it's a good idea -
should've
been doing in a long time ago. I will inquire about putting
something
in the footers of these demo sites so people know what's going
on with
it.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 7, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:33 PM, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
you can subscribe to the commits mailing list to see what the
latest rev
is. It will also let you see what has changed, and you can
patch
from
those changes if you wish.
That what I did the very first day when I join the OFBiz
project.
But thanks
for reminding again :)
Both demo sites are updated nightly, from what David says.
I am not pretty sure about that. The point was if demo sites
updates
nightly
than what could be the reason that I could create Shopping
List on
demo site
and
could not do the same on my local copy of OFBiz trunk and that
kind of
frustrating. So thats why I suggest to put Revision Number along
with the
Trunk and Release labels.
Vikas
you can get the Trunk and Release ver 4 demo URLs from
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
Vikas Mayur sent the following on 3/6/2008 11:03 PM:
If its a revision before the fix goes in (that might be
because it
is
updated in some regular intervals, might be day or two or
more),
than I
am
not sure why this (creating shopping list) was working on
the Demo
Site.
IMO it would be good to have the revision number along with
the
label
Trunk
Demo and Release 4.0 Branch Demo so that it will help in
testing
things
against the Demo and that because most of the time we do (I
do ...) this
to
verify things if some things goes wrong on the local instance.
Vikas
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:49 PM, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
your are using a rev before the fix he put in.
you code does not match the latest trunk used on the demo
Vikas Mayur sent the following on 3/6/2008 5:51 AM:
Bilgin, Thanks for looking at it.
Tomorrow I will give it a try and let you know how it goes.
I am not sure why this is working on Demo Ecommerce Site, if
they run
on
latest trunk.
Vikas
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Bilgin Ibryam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Vikas,
You can check rev630718 and OFBIZ-1590 for details about
these
new
fields.
I just committed a fix for it in rev634211. You can
update and
tell
me
if the bug still exists.
Regards,
Bilgin Ibryam
