Hey Guys, So is it a bug or feature that aded permission does not get saved to SecurityPermission entity?
JohnBrown wrote: > > Yes, that is what I mean. The manually added permission for whatever > reason did not go to SecurityPermission entity which holds the list of > permissions. > > > Vikas Mayur-2 wrote: >> >> There is a one-nofk relation between SecurityGroupPermission --> >> SecurityPermission on permissionId field. >> I think, this is the reason its not giving fk error. >> >> If we going to add new security group and than want to add permission(s) >> using Ui, It should also add this permission to SecurityPermission, Since >> this is the entity which holds the list of Security Permission in system. >> Is >> there any specific reason it is not done in Ui. >> >> Vikas >> >> >> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:14 PM, JohnBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> HI Guys, >>> >>> I have a question. Is there a particular reason why the permission which >>> is >>> added manually ( i.e. not selected from the permissions list) on >>> Security-> >>> permission tab is NOT get saved to SecurityPermission entity where all >>> the >>> permissions are stored? It appears that manually added permission just >>> stored in SecurityGroupPermission to make a mapping to group, but not to >>> SecurityPermission. While normally it would require foreign key >>> constraint >>> SecurityGroupPermission - > SecurityPermission on permissionId field? >>> >>> Please, let me know. Thanks. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/security-permission-tp16993344p16993344.html >>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/security-permission-tp16993344p17137109.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
