Jacques,
I am actually using "Distinguishing" not "Standard".
If I select anything other than "Distinguishing" I do not have the features
visible in the product detals in ecommerce.

What is the difference with "selectable" ?

-Bruno

2008/5/18 Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi Bruno,
>
> Use selectable instead of "standard"
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Bruno Busco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  Scott,
>> reading documentation and exploring the catalog manager application I am
>> actually on the path of defining same feature types and features for
>> "Diameter", "Height", "Width", "Speed code" and "Load code" and adding
>> them
>> to my product as "Distinguishing" features.
>>
>> So doing I get the features printed out in the product details in
>> ecommerce
>> and a combo for each one of the feature is present in the category search
>> in
>> ecommerce.
>>
>> I started defining the features as "standard" but they were not displayed
>> in
>> the product details in ecommerce.
>>
>> Now, for the brand, since it would be good to let the customer filter for
>> it
>> also, should I use another feature or use the "Brand Name" field?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Bruno
>>
>> 2008/5/18 Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>  Sounds like virtual/variant products could be a good fit, you've got a
>>> brand
>>> name (category?) model name (virtual product) and then the various sizes
>>> (17x175x45) and codes for the variants.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> 2008/5/18 Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> > I am considering to use ofbiz to implement an ecommerce site that sells
>>> > exclusively tyres.
>>> > Every tyre product has a specific code and some parameters as diameter,
>>> > width, height, load code and speed code.
>>> >
>>> > In the site there should be the possibility to filter and list all
>>> product
>>> > specifing one or more of the above parameters.
>>> > I would like to know what is the preferred way to implement this.
>>> > Every tyre type must have a specific productId toghether with its
>>> > parameters
>>> > so I do not think this is going to be a configurable product, am I
>>> right?
>>> >
>>> > At the moment I have extended the Product entity with those additional
>>> > fields, but I am not sure to have done the best think.
>>> >
>>> > Any help will be greatly appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > -Bruno
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to