> If not enough inventory the item becomes back > ordered? Well, that's what the current code does, but is that what you want to have it do?
I would think so, we could add an additional check up front to see if inventory is available at the facility but with that flow the app should then probably NOT allow the order to be generated with the selected product. I would rather allow the system to generate the order with the current flow of: Generate order -> check/reserve inventory -> change status of order and item. We have also built a custom product selector which displays products by product id, facility, ATP, QOH (essentially a grouping of the inventory item entity). Putting the facility Id on the order item ship group I agree is a good idea as facility really does belong with the ship group info. Len -----Original Message----- From: David Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Nick Rosser; Dave Tenerowicz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Creating Single orders whcih have products thatneed to ship from differnt facilities On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:23:47 -0400, "Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intended for the user to specify the intended facility. Once the id has > been saved on the order item the reservation services would treat the item > as always except for the fact that it would simply know which facility to > check reservations against. Okay, that sounds fine then. A new field would probably be needed, something like "desiredFacilityId". To make it more flexible, could we put it on the OrderItemShipGroupAssoc entity? That would make it possible to specify multiple desired facilities for a single OrderItem if the OrderItem is split among multiple ship groups. We might even be able to simplify it and put it on the OrderItemShipGroup and just say all item in that ship group should ship from the given facility. That would be easier to implement, but would be more restrictive... so nevermind, let's put it on the OrderItemShipGroupAssoc entity. > If not enough inventory the item becomes back > ordered? Well, that's what the current code does, but is that what you want to have it do? -David
