On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 10:11 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > Is there a reason why a requirement would not be created for a product > that > > is configurable? > > > > Regards, > > Paul
It should create after r682365 Bilgin
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 10:11 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > Is there a reason why a requirement would not be created for a product > that > > is configurable? > > > > Regards, > > Paul
It should create after r682365 Bilgin