The problem is I DONT want the taxes to be added ofcourse. There is only ONE Tax in CA.
But your post brings up another thing I noticed - The format of the Geo id seems to be like <GeoIdParent>-<GeoIdChild> is that true? I looked at the code and for country and postal code for shipping, thats the format that it looks under. Is this documented anywhere? kunal aggarwal wrote: > > hi Ritesh > > Create your company in such a way that its shipping address contain state > as > well as city. > > U need to create 2 tax authorities > 1. With GEO as CA(state only) > 2. With GEO as CA-state( state with city) > > then you will be charged with both taxes ....state as well as for city > > > try this. > Hope this will help > > > KUNAL > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Ritesh Trivedi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> Current tax calculations in Ofbiz are quiet complex and hence difficult >> to >> understand completely. I have run in to situations (during testing) which >> highlights the fact that user entry errors can cause tax calculations to >> be >> mis-calculated. e.g. If user enters City and Zip code which are not >> related >> - meaning somehow geo_assoc for that doesnt exist (may be because the tax >> data imported by me wasnt didnt have the complete list or was done by the >> user on purpose or unknowingly) I dont see a way to have a catch all tax >> where the tax e.g. in the case of California, if none no tax authority >> could >> be found and if the state was CA, the the default tax charged should be >> 8.25% or whatever. >> >> >> For proper tax calculations for California in Ofbiz I can only have 1 tax >> authority and since in California CBOE publishes tax rates by the city I >> have chosen to define city based tax authorities only. I cannot have both >> CA >> state tax authority along with city based tax authorities since ofbiz tax >> calculations seems like it adds those 2 while calculating tax for the >> cart. >> >> Let me know if my understanding of tax authority in Ofbiz is off and if >> there is a way to have catch all. >> >> Thanks >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Catch-All-Tax-Authority--tp18877920p18877920.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Catch-All-Tax-Authority--tp18877920p18878831.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
