Quick and late answer. Yes this seems intentional. I'm not sure it will help
but you could have a look at AutoAcctgTransTests.xml
Jacques
From: "Rees Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi
I have been studying the accounts closely because I need to implement VAT
amongst other things.
We seem to be setting the incorrect type ( invoice_item_type ) into a field
that requires ( gl_account_type )
in the set statement <set field="debitEntry.glAccountTypeId" from-field="invoiceItem.invoiceItemTypeId"/> found in <simple-method
method-name="createAcctgTransForPurchaseInvoice" > in file GeneralledgerService.xml
This means that the value will always default in <simple-method method-name="getGlAccountFromAccountType" short-description="Look up
a GlAccountId from GlAccountTypeId"> to UNINVOICED_SHIP_RCPT for a purchase order.
From the user perspective:
When adding a new item to a purchase invoice the user can select an Invoice
Item Type.
I do not think the user choice has any effect on the accounts. I think no matter what selection is made the result for the accounts
is an entry in UNINVOICED_SHIP_RCPT.
Is this intentional? I am not currently able to suggest a solution but feel it would be better to set the field to
UNINVOICED_SHIP_RCPT directly..
Kind regards
Rees
