-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I use it in the Widgets.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/22/2008 3:11 AM: > OK, If noboby cares I will get rid of all that ! > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> >> Mmm, BTW where is this intended to be used ? In Header.ftl I suppose, >> but there are any uses of this labels for the moment... >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> >>> OK, I remove, OK for everybody (last chance ;o) ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> PS : Karim, yes this is a real pain we you have to localize. We are a >>> few a to work on this... >>> >>> From: "Karim Rahimpur" <[email protected]> >>>> Hi Jacques, >>>> >>>> IMO CommonCompanySubtitle would be a good solution. Actually I've come >>>> across a lot of duplicated labels (literally the same thing again and >>>> again) among applications and also within the same application, so from >>>> my point of view any effort to reduce duplicate labels would be very >>>> welcome. So again, for the common case, I think CommonCompanySubtitle >>>> would be good. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Karim >>>> >>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> Hi OFBiz community, >>>>> >>>>> In r728061 I merged all current CompanySubtitle labels in all >>>>> languages. >>>>> It was a real mess and hard to maintain. I wondered if I should put >>>>> them all under a ComonCompanySubtitle label and remove all others. >>>>> But I thought they could maybe be used with other meaning in real >>>>> world applications (ie not OOTB). So I kept them all. >>>>> There are some duplicates in some languages. I kept them commentent >>>>> out at end of lines. >>>>> >>>>> Please review in your language. Do you think we should kept them as >>>>> I did or we should better create a ComonCompanySubtitle label and >>>>> remove all others ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your opinions >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: >>>>> 17/12/2008 19:21 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJT4DLrP3NbaWWqE4RAmkyAKCPAEpY1EEDT9JYV78l0ixL6pSEuQCgh5d6 MY/aMeGyFqgUPYqIdKIBtqo= =eq+d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
