OK, looking forwad for you help on this topic :p
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman" <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I mean documentation about ofbiz or am I out of line.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/2/2009 12:32 AM:
You mean in wiki FAQ for instance, or in wiki at large ?
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman" <[email protected]>
Please start referring to entities and fields
also point out the use of the webtools entity maintanence.
need to get away from database terminology.
thanks.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Datasource vs Database
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:43:02 +0100
From: Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>
+1
Could you compile a list of changes needed please ?
Thks
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman" <[email protected]>
I would like our documentation of refer only to Datasources and entities
and remove references to Databases and Tables.
The only exception would be when we are talking about a Datasource that
is a Database the files that relate directly to a Database like the
fieldtype
My reason is that people like me, that come from a database centric
background, have a tendency to relate to references to databases that
takes them down the wrong path.
We need to make a strong statement that the Database is simply a
type datasource for Storing Data, nothing else.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJhsLvrP3NbaWWqE4RAmSvAKC1xCPBUMqMcZIEsPe7lNGrXj+tdQCgku4s
Hzk/UtEt3QAGilQ6vij8Otk=
=aXlR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
