Arpit, Amit,
The lines 1002, 1003, 1006, 1007 and 1008 in file ProductWorker.java are commented out because they have been replaced by the
localised label "cart.addToCart.incompatibilityVariantFeature". This label contains less information than was in those lines but is
more general. I guess it's enough for an error explanation and we should keep the warnings in log. I will completly remove these
lines to prevent further expectations like yours.
Please see my other comments in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2170?focusedCommentId=12670916#action_12670916
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Arpit Singh Pandya" <[email protected]>
Thanks jacques,.
I am eagerly waiting for your suggestion.
Kind Regards
Arpit Singh Pandya
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I will have a look at it...
Thanlks
Jacques
From: "Arpit Singh Pandya" <[email protected]>
Yes Amit, Jacques , All
Of course its a general problem, in the current scenario the entity
(ProductFeatureIactn) is of no use because of the following
reason
I have doubts regarding to this entity
*Doubt* :-
1. If we are not giving the entry of *productId* field of
entity ProductFeatureIactn in the *DemoProduct.xml*
file, which is needed .
what is the use of this without proper entry ?
2. The code which is used to apply this functionality *(ie
which features are incompatible or depended with
any particular
product)* in ProductWorker.java are commented, why so...?
3. and also there are some code of no use...??
I have a proposal for this problem with the solution :-
1. Make an entry of productId in ProductFeatureIactn entity
of DemoProduct.xml file.
2. I Uncomment the lines which are in use to implement this
functionality *(**ie it will work for
functionality, which features are incompatible or depended
with any particular product**)* in ecommerce
component.
3.and also i deleted some code of no use there.
and i even checked it with this changes on ecommerce component which is already
described in my previous mail , which is
working fine for me.
I have a working patch for this Problem.
what do you think.?
and Please let me know if I am wrong in any point, your comments are most
welcome.
Kind Regards
Arpit Singh Pandya
Amit Sharma wrote:
Actually i need that type of functionality which will help to create custom
application for me. that's why i gone through
where it is implemented.
so i think its general problem and
<ProductFeatureIactn productFeatureId="9000" productFeatureIdTo="9002"
productFeatureIactnTypeId="FEATURE_IACTN_INCOMP"/>
because above line should make sense in DemoProduct.xml
but its not .
After doing this
1. You have to make entry for productId field on ProductFeatureIactn entity like for
product say productId="WG-9944"
2. Uncomment line no. 1002, 1003 and 1006 in file ProductWorker.java
3. Comment line no. 1007 and 1008 in file ProductWorker.java
which has explain by Arpit , works fine
please let me know about your views.
Thanks & Regards
Amit Sharma
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Is this still a problem for you ? I mean is it a general problem ?
Jacques
From: "Amit Sharma" <[email protected]>
Hello Users,
Can somebody help regarding ProductFeatureIactn entity in DemoProduct.xml file
of ecommerce application that where we are
getting the changes when we put
productFeatureIactnTypeId="FEATURE_IACTN_DEPEND" or
productFeatureIactnTypeId="FEATURE_IACTN_INCOMP".
i thing if we take productFeatureIactnTypeId="FEATURE_IACTN_INCOMP" the
following line
<ProductFeatureIactn productFeatureId="9000" productFeatureIdTo="9002"
productFeatureIactnTypeId="FEATURE_IACTN_INCOMP"/>
Here 9000 is incompatible with 9002 but i can't get the affect on product
WG-9944 and WG-9943 in which both the features are
applied.
So please help me to figure it out , how it works.
Thanks in advance
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma wrote:
Hello all,
I was reviewing DemoProduct.xml of ecommerce.
Can anybody tell me what is the use of ProductFeatureIactn entity.
Thanks and Regards
Amit Sharma
