-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

And if you have sites frequently under heavy load then chances are a
shared server isn't a good idea anyway.

exactly.

David E Jones sent the following on 3/31/2009 3:16 PM:
> 
> What does peak CPU have to do with it? All programs use significant CPU
> time every now and then... but usually not for long periods of time. App
> servers typically don't use much CPU time unless they are under heavy
> load... and if you have sites frequently under heavy load then chances
> are a shared server isn't a good idea anyway. So, what's the point?
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:13 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> 
> sounds like you got it working on shared server, based on my experience
> when seems lot less than yours, I don't see how more than one instance
> can share when another instance is running 70-90% cpu, at peak times.
> 
> I would guess it is like a bare-bones system with out many threads, or
> activity.
> 
> 
> David E Jones sent the following on 3/31/2009 1:34 PM:
>>>>
>>>> OFBiz will definitely work on a shared server, I've worked with dozens
>>>> of clients who have done that. It isn't too hard to fit half a dozen
>>>> instances on a single low-end (but modern) server, with databases for
>>>> each too. Of course, shared server approaches are as varied as holidays
>>>> around the world and there are many variations where OFBiz would not
>>>> run.
>>>>
>>>> Running in 256M would be pretty tight, even for a low-traffic site. Is
>>>> that the amount of memory available to the OS, or to the JVM? If it is
>>>> the memory available to the OS, and if there is no database also running
>>>> on the box (which would definitely make 256M too little), then the -Xmx
>>>> parameter should be about 2/3 of your memory (the 256M). If that is the
>>>> amount available to the JVM, then set -Xmx to 256M, and -Xms to the same
>>>> thing (on a dedicated server no use having Java play with expanding and
>>>> contracting the memory it uses).
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 31, 2009, at 1:44 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> as the startofbiz.sh says. 128megs minimum.
>>>> Xms128M -Xmx512M
>>>> Ofbiz will not work on a shared server.
>>>> there are times it will use 70-90% of the CPU time.
>>>>
>>>> Branden Strickland sent the following on 3/31/2009 9:10 AM:
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's been a while since I've worked with OFBIZ but the time has
>>>>>>> come to
>>>>>>> resume working with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know the answer to my question (sort of) but need some guidance
>>>>>>> from some
>>>>>>> good JAVA guys... (YOU!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Overview:
>>>>>>> Godaddy's virtual dedicated servers are setup with virtuoso, they
>>>>>>> alocate
>>>>>>> only the needed memory up to what you have for max (me = 256mb)  This
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> be fine as I've gotten a test box with that to run OFBIZ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have everything setup; Ant, JDK1.6,ofbiz svn exported.
>>>>>>> Centos 5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I go to do an ant run-install-seed I get:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Error occurred during initialization of VM
>>>>>>> Could not reserve enough space for object heap
>>>>>>> Could not create the Java virtual machine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've inserted an alias into my /etc/profile.d/java.sh (same as bashrc
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> cleaner for CENT/RHEL products) so that I have:
>>>>>>> export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.6.0_13/jre
>>>>>>> PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin
>>>>>>> alias java='java -Xms2m -Xmx16m'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm told the Xms and Xmx will help lower the memory hogging that java
>>>>>>> wants
>>>>>>> to do, but I'm having little success.  I'm fine with java -version
>>>>>>> and javac
>>>>>>> -version.  So JVM itself is working, but I think it's trying to
>>>>>>> grab too
>>>>>>> much memory that the virtual server core won't grant me at one time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone worked this this type of thing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!!
>>>>>>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJ0pekrP3NbaWWqE4RAvCwAJ9hnAOfj2Oh4oT9czjQ82/sJ6qaUACdElZQ
NoKOUkB5rFefaO7pduJoeaA=
=/dQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to