-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

+1

Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 4/2/2009 12:55 AM:
> Hi David,
> 
> I'd see this detailled explanation in a wiki main ENDUSER page like
> "Some questions and answers about OFBiz to help you make your choice"
> 
> Jacques
> 
> From: "David E Jones" <[email protected]>
>> On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:05 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi colleagues,
>>>
>>> I am writing to the list to request information concerning OFBiz. I am
>>> doing a eCommerce Software comparative between the main commercial and
>>> open source products.
>>>
>>> I have achieved to find information about client segmentation (use of
>>> groups), campaign managment (through Marketing Manager and  promotions),
>>> stocks management (Facility Manager), product catalog (Product 
>>> Manager),
>>> order management (using Order Manager application), content management
>>> (through Content Manager)...
>>>
>>> However, there are other features I have not been able to document. I
>>> would be very grateful if you could send me details about the  following
>>> features:
>>>
>>> - Reports & analytics capabilities
>>
>> OFBiz currently has a few dozens pre-written reports OOTB, and more 
>> can be added using the OFBiz tools, or an external reporting tool 
>> (which is still very common, ie companies that use something like 
>> Crystal Reports or Business Objects will use that with their OFBiz 
>> applications). OFBiz has tools in the framework to facilitate
>> building  of user interfaces, and these same tools are used for
>> building  reports. This provides a high level of efficiency, and
>> allows  developers to use the same tools they are used to... and in
>> some cases  scripts and other things can even be reused in reports.
>>
>> OFBiz also includes some BI infrastructure to support defining and 
>> populating star schemas, which can then be used for ad-hoc or pre-
>> written reports. A limited star schema exists, and work is going on
>> to  extend it.
>>
>>> - Integration and Interoperability (SOA Architecture, Web Services 
>>> offered)
>>
>> The OFBiz logic layer is itself a Service-Oriented tool, and all 
>> primary logic in OFBiz is implemented as services. Many of these
>> services can be exposed externally as web services automatically, and 
>> the more complex ones can be exposed as web services (or call web 
>> services) through web services code that maps to them.
>>
>>> - Usability (for final customers, and administrators)
>>
>> Usability is very subjective, but I'll try to answer in a helpful way.
>>
>> OFBiz is often customized for larger organizations, and in those
>> cases  the best usability is achieved by analyzing processes and then 
>> building user interfaces to directly support those processes. This 
>> results in something specific to end-user requirements and is far 
>> better than any OOTB user interface that even the best designers
>> could  create without specific requirements.
>>
>> That is the main design goal behind OFBiz: easy customization since 
>> the only way to get a really good UI is to do so based on very 
>> specific requirements... and those requirements tend to change 
>> dramatically between organizations, in many cases even organizations 
>> in the same industry.
>>
>> The OOTB user interfaces are primarily meant for easy reuse in custom 
>> user interfaces, so they mostly avoid automating any specific process 
>> and are instead meant to fit into any process desired. However, using 
>> the OOTB interfaces is pretty common and is usually best done by 
>> documenting where and how to do common tasks according to the 
>> processes of the organization. In other words, instead of creating a 
>> custom UI when you are on a tighter budget you can simply document
>> how  to use the OOTB interfaces, and while not usually excellent this
>> way  it is quite adequate for smaller organizations and gives them
>> more  functionality and ability to automate things than they would
>> have in  most software, allowing them to avoid large numbers of
>> spreadsheets  and such. Overall this results in tools to keep track
>> and automate  organizational information that are far more efficient
>> and usable that a hodge-podge of various systems.
>>
>>> - Personalization potential
>>
>> Personalization is an extremely general term, broadly meaning
>> behavior  or data that changes according to the user. There are
>> hundreds of  features in OFBiz ecommerce and the OFBiz back-end
>> (manager) apps that  would fit this description.
>>
>> Please feel free to send over more details and I (or others) will be 
>> happy to comment on them.
>>
>>> - Multidevice sites available?
>>
>> It is pretty easy to build sites targeted at different devices, and 
>> there are some available OOTB. If by "device" you mean a specific UI 
>> then the hhfacility component is a good example. If by "device" you 
>> mean specific hardware control (like cash drawers and CC scanners), 
>> then the pos component (point-of-sale) has some good stuff.
>>
>>> - Accessibility considered?
>>
>> In ecommerce the templates are often changed so much that 
>> accessibility ends up more in the hands of the designers and
>> developers who customize the system (so make sure you have a good 
>> service provider!). The OOTB ecommerce templates do a pretty good job 
>> of this by using styled text instead of images, alt-text on images, 
>> and so on.
>>
>> For the OOTB back-end functionality, accessibility is considered, and 
>> to be maintained it must be considered in customizations. These are 
>> primarily web-based applications and to improve accessibility are
>> very  text-heavy, etc.
>>
>>> Thank you for your help in advance.
>>
>> No problem, best wishes in finding a solution that meets your needs.
>>
>> -David
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJ1KFGrP3NbaWWqE4RAtZGAJ9VUTvoyTijWYJxKYKkzK7R1U2l6gCfQ6Lb
QSYpKGpwgcfWmvzmmw9Huo8=
=MeKG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to