Hi Ashish, thanks for your reply .
As I can see you have chosen the approach to change the port numbers. I am currently trying the 2nd one - to bind all the ports to a single virtual interface by removing all the localhost, 127.0.0.1 and 0.0.0.0 occurances. Currently I am stuck on the RMI registry , as LocateRegistry.createRegistry(namingPort); ( org.ofbiz.base.container.NamingServiceContainer.start(NamingServiceContainer.java:62) ) accepts only port number and always binds to localhost. I'm working on that. If I manage to run 2 of these guys ( ofbiz ) on separate network interfaces without any collisions or cross rmi calls I'll post a notice. If I don't succeed than I'll just go on by changing the port numbers only as you have described. So- stay tuned :) Thanks again for your reply. Cheers, Deyan On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 18:26 +0530, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: > Below is my post dated May 21, 2009 on the user mailing list on the User > Mailing list. > I guess you have missed my reply. > Please read the details, give it a try and if got stuckup somewhere then > come back to discuss the things. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Yes this can be easily done in OFBiz. > > Open ofbiz-containers.xml file. > (framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml) > Change the value of port in all the property by name "port". For ex. you > can change http port from 8080 to 28080 > > Then open url.property file. (framework/webapp/config/url.properties) > Keep the value of http & https port same as you set in the > ofbiz-containers.xml file. > > So now we have two instance of OFBiz server on the same machine. > > -- One is running on 8080 & another one is running on 28080 port. > > For accessing the same database you should keep the settings of database > same in entityengine.xml file. > This is all from my side. > > Now its your turn to give it a try and if got stuck up somewhere in b/w > then shoot an email on mailing list. > Thanks ! >
