Yes, I know the invoice sequence. However it does not use the
GenericDelegator.getNextSeqId()  method  but uses it own service: 

getNextInvoiceId 
in 

component://accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/invoice/InvoiceServices.xml

It's a simple ( xml ) service. 

My suggestion was regarding the SequenceBank - to add additional feature
to that class. 

Cheers, 
Deyan 


On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:35 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> take a look at
> accounting>globalGLSettings>Assign GL Account> Accounting Preferences
> Invoice Sequence
> 
> 
> 
> Deyan Tsvetanov sent the following on 6/22/2009 7:30 AM:
> > Hi again, 
> > 
> > finally I used GenericDelegator.getNextSeqIdLong() when creating
> > entities. 
> > 
> > It does increment the sequence by 1. 
> > 
> > However today I noticed, that in the database - sequence_value_item
> > table  - the seq_id value gets incremented by 10. 
> > 
> > The reason is that the org.ofbiz.entity.util.SequenceUtil class creates
> > a SequenceBank with the default value ot 10 IDs. 
> > 
> > This is a MAJOR problem. It would appear if the server dies or gets a
> > hard restart for some reason ( or even JVM error ) - we'll end up with
> > gaps.  
> > 
> > I couldn't find any API that forces the SequenceUtil to create a
> > SequnenceBank sized to 1 . Is there a way to do it ?
> > 
> > 
> > Also: 
> > 
> > I couldn't find any info in the mail threads regarding this sequencing
> > mechanism being thread safe. 
> > Although I ran several threads requesting next ID from the same sequence
> > - and it works OK -  I am not quite convinced what would happen if we
> > have 2 ofbiz instances running against the same database. Is this setup
> > supported ?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance, 
> > Deyan 
> > 
> > On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 15:27 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >> This has been already dicussed many times. You may find information using 
> >> MarMail or Nable, some threads are even very detailled
> >>
> >> Good luck
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> From: "Deyan Tsvetanov" <[email protected]>
> >>> Exactly, I knew I've seen it somewhere :)
> >>> "Enforced Sequence (no gaps, per organization)"
> >>>
> >>> Thanks guys, 
> >>> I'll have a look at it. 
> >>>
> >>> Another question: do you have any idea how this enforced sequence might
> >>> behave in case of two ofbiz servers - in a cluster or sharing a
> >>> database ?
> >>>
> >>> My goal is to generate IDs without absolutely any gaps. 
> >>>
> >>> Another very important requirement is that the order of the record's
> >>> CREATED_DATE should match the order of the IDs. It is not possible to go
> >>> back and fill a gap. 
> >>>
> >>> Example: 
> >>>
> >>> A good example:
> >>>   ID          |           CREATED_DATE
> >>> ---------------------------------------------
> >>>    1          |            1 June  9:00 AM
> >>>    2          |            1 June 10:00 AM
> >>>
> >>> A bad example:
> >>>
> >>>   ID          |           CREATED_DATE
> >>> ---------------------------------------------
> >>>    1          |            1 June 10:00 AM
> >>>    2          |            1 June  9:00 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I already have an idea of a workaround, 
> >>> but I'll investigate the enforced sequence first. 
> >>>
> >>> Thanks again, 
> >>> Deyan 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:42 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> >>>> Organization GL Settings >Available Internal
> >>>> Organizations>Company>Setup>Accounting Preferences
> >>>>
> >>>> David E Jones sent the following on 6/13/2009 5:15 AM:
> >>>>> Take a look at the party/organization accounting preferences in the
> >>>>> Accounting Manager. If you're looking for this sort of sequencing for
> >>>>> invoices, orders, etc then it is already supported.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 13, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Deyan Tsvetanov wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi list,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to use a custom ID generator - for instance rather to start
> >>>>>> from 10000 and increment by 10 I'd like to start from 0, increment by 1
> >>>>>> leaving no empty values and probably append some other rules - like to
> >>>>>> reset to 0 in the beginning of each year and prefix the returned ID by
> >>>>>> the current year.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Example:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 200900001
> >>>>>> 200900002
> >>>>>> ....
> >>>>>> 200932110
> >>>>>> ....
> >>>>>> 201000001    <--- a new year starts.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I know it may sound pretty dumb, but the law makers in some countries
> >>>>>> are not so smart.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So - could somebody give me some hints - is it possible to specify a
> >>>>>> custom ID generator per field typed "id-ne" in the entitymodel.xml ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>>>> Deyan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> BJ Freeman
> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro
> Systems Integrator.
> 

Reply via email to