Hi Chris:
I guess I'm just use to the inconvenience. :-( The other thing I do to
try and minimize restart time is to comment out the components I might
not be using.
Ruth
snowc wrote:
Hi Ruth - I am compiling at the component level.
Ruth Hoffman-2 wrote:
Hi Jacques:
True, but I have found that many times Java is the preferable way to go.
That said, I wonder, Chris, are you building (running ant) at the
component level? If so, then I wonder why it would take that long. If
you build at the root level, yes, that is a pain. But locally in the
component...that, to me is worth the small amount of time it takes build
and restart.
Just my 2 cents.
Ruth
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OFBiz has been conceived with this idea in mind. I mean reducing the
need to restart the server. That's one of the reason why the minilang
exists...
Jacques
From: "snowc" <[email protected]>
Although I much prefer editing java over bsh, I keep finding myself
using bsh
over java to overcome the lengthy compile/restart cycle (similar to the
problem with fat ejb versus thin pojo development). Is there a way to
reduce this cycle?
jacques.le.roux wrote:
As long as you modify Java code, you will still need to compile,
hence to
stop and restart the server (else you get a conflict on
jars used when compiling)
Jacques
From: "snowc" <[email protected]>
Everytime I make a change to java code, I run "ant" and then
restart the
ofbiz service to pick up the changes.
Is this still necessary? I am running r4.0. What about 9.04
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-compile-and-ofbiz-restart-still-needed-for-java-changes--tp24971472p24971472.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-compile-and-ofbiz-restart-still-needed-for-java-changes--tp24971472p24971811.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
