On Sep 10, 2009, at 5:01 PM, James McGill wrote:

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, BJ Freeman <[email protected]> wrote:

if your are time and resource constrained, ofbiz is not right for you.


Do you say that in general, or is there something inherent in
subscription-based services that makes a poor fit with OFBiz?

There wasn't a lot of detail in the original question, but yes, OFBiz does support products sold as subscriptions in a variety of forms (ie with lots of options supported OOTB). To really say yes or no you'd have to do a gap analysis based on more detailed requirements.

I'm not sure what BJ meant, as he wasn't very specific either. Whatever he meant, I don't agree. If you are writing a simple application and don't want to reuse existing functionality the OFBiz framework itself is a great way of doing things and a great set of tools that IMO competes well with everything else out there in terms of developer efficiency and runtime scalability. For more complex applications Apache OFBiz becomes even more valuable as long as you make sure to reuse existing things, and then you can really put together complex applications quickly.

Perhaps what BJ meant is that if you have any sort of complex set of requirements then it will require effort no matter what tools or existing functionality you try to use. If you think that you can find something to use OOTB, or even adjust your requirement to fit some OOTB solution, just make sure you review it in detail first! It can certainly work out, but often doesn't. Even if it does pretty much all businesses that live more than a year or so will want to change and expand things and many solutions designed to be used only OOTB will make that difficult. Again, this is where OFBiz comes in with a combination of existing functionality and flexibility too.

-David


Reply via email to