Hi Jacques, thanks for the response. This question seems like it should be in the FAQ?
jacques.le.roux wrote: > > You may be interested by http://markmail.org/message/ixw3eazzpz64q7bc > > Jacques > > From: "snowc" <[email protected]> >> >> On more detailed investigation, the ResourceTypes in seed data are: >> >> MONEY >> RAW_MATERIALS >> LABOR >> SERVICES >> FINISHED_GOODS >> DELIVERED_GOODS >> >> These obviously describe the type of resource. However, the >> glAccountClass >> and glAccountType seem to be modeling very similar concepts: >> >> glAccountType >> >> ACCOUNTS_RECEIVABLE >> ACCOUNTS_PAYABLE >> BALANCE_ACCOUNT >> BANK_STLMNT_ACCOUNT >> UNDEPOSITED_RECEIPTS >> MRCH_STLMNT_ACCOUNT >> CURRENT_ASSET >> FIXED_ASSET >> FIXED_ASSET_MAINT >> OTHER_ASSET >> CREDIT_CARD >> CURRENT_LIABILITY >> ... >> >> glAccountClass: >> >> DEBIT >> CREDIT >> RESOURCE >> ASSET >> CURRENT_ASSET >> CASH_EQUIVALENT >> INVENTORY_ASSET >> LONGTERM_ASSET >> LIABILITY >> CURRENT_LIABILITY >> ... >> >> What are the differences between these concepts? Why are two entities >> required, and not just the one? >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> snowc wrote: >>> >>> What are the main differences between the following fields?: >>> >>> glAccountClassId (E.g. "CASH_EQUIVALENT") >>> glAccountTypeId (E.g. "CURRENT_ASSET") >>> glResourceTypeId (E.g. "MONEY") >>> >>> I've read through the ManagerReferenceAccounting, but I'm still a bit >>> confused. >>> >>> Many thanks in advance, >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Accounting-definitions%3A-glAccountClassId%2C-glAccountTypeId%2C-glResourceTypeId-tp25414987p25417951.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Accounting-definitions%3A-glAccountClassId%2C-glAccountTypeId%2C-glResourceTypeId-tp25414987p25418195.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
