Thanks Ruth, I really appreciate your help and your explanation has resolved my confusion. Now I have a path and direction to move on.
Regards, Deepak On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Ruth Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Deepak: > Yes, the parallel release numbering can be confusing, and I believe deters > many potential newcomers. It is an unfortunate state of affairs. > > I've been using OFBiz almost since the project's inception and IMHO, the > best place to start exploring the many and varied aspects of this amazing > project is with the older, more stable 4.x release. OFBiz veterans will > argue most vociferously against this advice, suggesting newer and bigger is > better. I maintain that from an end-user and new-user's point of view the > 4.x release works and behaves in a very predictable fashion. While it may > not have all the newer features and functions as documented here > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features one gets a really > good sense of how OFBiz works by tinkering with it for a short time. > > Once you're comfortable with 4.x and know where you want to go with OFBiz, > it is much easier to master the new, more feature reach 9.x releases. OFBiz > has much to offer and sometimes, the best way to digest it all is by taking > small bites. > > Just my 2 cents. > Ruth Hoffman > ---------------------------------------------------- > [email protected] > Want to know more about OFBiz? Please visit my website: > http://www.myofbiz.com > > > > > Deepak Gupta wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am a newbie who is starting to explore Ofbiz, but i am confused with two >> sets of parallel major release numbers release 9.x and release 4.x could >> you >> please provide me some information whats the difference between two and >> which one is latest? >> >> Thanks and regards, >> Deepak >> >> >> >
