Hi Jonatan,

From: "jonatan soto" <seniledemen...@gmail.com>
Maven can also solve the problem of the distributable releases, centralize a
repository for the modules and much more. The inclusion of Maven affects all
the life cycle of any project improving the control of all the required
phases. But i understand that Ofbiz is a very huge and mature project so
that means it will be very difficult to integrate it.

I agree Maven 2 is great but, you got the point <<very difficult to integrate 
...>>.
We have other priorities...

Thanks

Jacques

From my point of view, it's very dificult to decide between Ofbiz and other
ERP. As a new user/developer I see Ofbiz almost focused to ecommerce that is
very convenient for my present ecommerce project but in the other hand I see
Ofbiz dificult to 'sell' if I decide to do some consulting for a
non-ecommerce companies. Anyway I will bet for Ofbiz because it is an Apache
project, and it makes me more confortable even more when I think how Apache
projects have been changed my developer life.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Abdullah Shaikh <
abdullah.sha...@viithiisys.com> wrote:

I am not sure, I haven't tried this, but could commenting the not required
components from component-load.xml file have helped ?

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Christopher Snow <
sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk> wrote:

> When I tried to remove the unwanted components, I can into dependency
> problems.  A modular approach to using the components such as maven would
> stop the developer having to manually work out dependencies to remove
> components.
>
> Leaving the unwanted components in place even though they don't get used
> makes DBA's and support people twitchy, asking questions like "why are
all
> those tables created even though they aren't used?"
>
>
> Abdullah Shaikh wrote:
>
>> Chris, I guess you mean to simplify the things, but then Ofbiz doesn't
>> force
>> to use all components, user can use only the required components and can
>> ignore the rest.
>>
>> As you said, probably party management, maybe someone else wants to only
>> order management or only ecommerce, so if all the components are there,
>> user
>> can decide which one to use.
>>
>> -Abdullah
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Christopher Snow <
>> sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> If a company start using ofbiz for small applications using just the
>>> development framework, they can be very productive within a few weeks.
>>> However, if they have to take on board the whole of ofbiz (i.e. the
>>> components) before they get started, that is a huge task that may put
>>> them
>>> off using ofbiz.
>>>
>>> If ofbiz followed the modular approach using maven, companies could
start
>>> using ofbiz core (+ probably party management), and then use more and
>>> more
>>> of the other components as they get more experienced.
>>>  Charles TJ - SELC Sales Div wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I am agree with you Chris, the OFBiz is an excellent framework;
>>>> OFBiz is like "The Beauty and The Beast".
>>>> The Beast for the newcomers, but if we understand the framework,
>>>> you will find "The Beauty of the OFBiz".
>>>>
>>>> - Charles TJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Christopher Snow [mailto:sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk]
>>>> Sent: 13 Nopember 2009 15:18
>>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: OFBiz in Canada?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ofbiz is an excellent application development framework.  I think that
>>>> any
>>>> efforts that would focus on selling this aspect would attract
newcomers
>>>> to
>>>> the project.  In the past, I have recommended ofbiz as a development
>>>> framework to a few architects and senior developers that I have worked
>>>> with.
>>>>  When they take a look at the ofbiz site, their first reaction is to
>>>> reject
>>>> ofbiz as they think it is just another ecommerce application.
>>>>
>>>> I know a few of the users on the mailing list would like to see the
core
>>>> development framework of ofbiz separated from the other components.
>>>>
>>>> It would be interesting to know how many of the committers for ofbiz
>>>> that
>>>> DON'T use ofbiz primarily for ecommerce.  I think that would be the
main
>>>> stumbling block to separating the core development framework.
>>>>
>>>> There are some interesting areas being worked on that such as Hans
>>>> Bakker's BIRT implementation and /Jacques Le/ Roux Axis integration
for
>>>> complex types that will give the development framework even more
power.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>




--
Jonatan Soto Aguilera
C/ Comte Borrell, 328 3º4ª
08029 Barcelona
Telf: +34935350010
Móvil: +34669908135
www.japanflavour.com


Reply via email to