Hi Chris,

I don't want to use xml-rpc but instead would like to use Flex HTTPService,
I guess xml-rpc would work with HTTPService.

Basic idea is to create a xml over http communication between ofbiz & any
other RIA, so that we can make ofbiz communicated with flex, gwt etc.

I will have a look at the link provided.

Thanks,
Abdullah

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Christopher Snow <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Abdullah,
>
> On my current project, we initially used xml-rpc using a flex xmlrpc
> library sent to me by Andrew Zeneski.
>
> We had tried using the new ofbiz soap implementation, but it didn't play
> nicely with flex.
>
> Have a look at XMLRPC in the faq:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo
>
> If you want a more optimised communication between flex and ofbiz, you can
> try BlazeDS:
>
>
> http://langhua.org/portal/portal/default/OFBiz/OFBizBlazeDSModulePortletWindow?windowstate=maximized
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> Abdullah Shaikh wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to develop a flex application which will interact with ofbiz using
>> xml.
>>
>> I just had a cursory view of xmlrpcclient & xmlserializer, has anybody
>> done
>> this ? what will be the best way to have ofbiz output xml ?
>>
>> I have seen that GenericValue can be easily converted to xml form.
>>
>> The request can be in xml form or can be a normal http request, but the
>> response from ofbiz should be in xml form, for example something like
>> this,
>>
>> <Orders>
>> <Order id="1" status="Approved"/> - all the required fields
>> <Order id="2" status="Created"/>
>> </Orders>
>>
>> <Parties>
>> <Party firstname="abc" lastname="xyz"> - all the required fields
>> </Parties>
>>
>> This way we can have a flex application communicate with ofbiz using xml
>> over http, I think flex don't understand json, so we need to go the xml
>> way
>> and also the benefits of xml is that with this approach ofbiz can interact
>> with any kind of RIA technology.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Abdullah
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to