+1 - OS Commerce has a huge install base, but they are quickly migrating away.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Feb 6, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Ruth,
> 
> I bet OS Commerce will sink quickly because of Magento. We don't care about 
> legacy... OS Commerce is already history...
> 
> Jacques
> 
> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <rhoff...@aesolves.com>
>> Hi Jacques:
>> The fact remains that OS Commerce has a huge installed base and has a long 
>> way to fall before it passes OFBiz on the way down.
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> This is so true (could be a testmonial on the corresponding wiki page, 
>>> though business level is required ;o),
>>> but to grow faster we must convince PHBs not devs :/
>>> 
>>> On the other hand  I believe that growing faster is not the right way to 
>>> think (look at what is happening to our world). Because I agree with your 
>>> arguments, I believe that when some other current "competitors" will have 
>>> disappeared (look at what is happenning to OS Commerce, if we could see it 
>>> as a competitor) OFBiz will still be there!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jacques
>>> 
>>> From: "Milind Parikh" <milindpar...@gmail.com>
>>>> ok.. here's my two cents... OfBiz is too complicated for the noobs. Ofbiz 
>>>> is
>>>> an extremely powerful framework. But with power comes responsibility. You
>>>> should be expected to spend 200-400 hours in understanding ofBiz., Anyone
>>>> who has dealt with commercial ERP (some of my "favorite" vendors come to
>>>> mind) would tell you that this is a awesome deal. Let me not even mention
>>>> what the other "vendors" make you go through.
>>>> 
>>>> Newbies (as opposed to noobs) will figure it out. ok.. a link is missing
>>>> here and there..so what ? Build a distribution of oFbiz on AWS or something
>>>> and then you won't need to rely on this infrastructure; if that is your 
>>>> pain
>>>> (it certainly is NOT mine).
>>>> 
>>>> I believe that ofbiz is much better than the rest of the open source erps.
>>>> It is a lot easier to integrate and has a well thought out framework.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> 
>>>> -- Milind
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Matt Warnock 
>>>> <mwarn...@ridgecrestherbals.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> My understanding is that the whole site has just changed hosting.  A few
>>>>> broken links are to be expected.  Doesn't mean no one is minding the
>>>>> store-- there is a lot to be done and a few things may be discovered as
>>>>> we go along.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The primary business is always developing the system-- the website that
>>>>> demonstrates and documents the system is ancillary.  Kind of like
>>>>> chewing Linus out because kernel.org has an outage or a broken link when
>>>>> changing hosting companies.  1) It isn't his main job (maybe not even a
>>>>> little bit). 2) Nothing is perfect, especially when a major change is
>>>>> underway.  3) How is someone going to know unless they are told exactly
>>>>> what the problem is?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Developers are mostly using svn to update, I'd bet.  So a broken
>>>>> download link would only be apparent to others (mostly first-time users,
>>>>> as you say).  Logs might mention it, but I don't know anyone that reads
>>>>> them daily, do you?  Automated log analyzers might help here to report
>>>>> broken links that developers don't often see.  So let's view this as an
>>>>> opportunity to improve ancillary parts of the system, which are also
>>>>> important in that newbies see them first.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 13:11 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Jacques:
>>>>> > That would be really nice, but I'm not even at that stage yet.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > My problem is with the download web page. There has been a major
>>>>> > regression here and no one has said a word (until me, right now) about
>>>>> > it. That leads me to say: "Who is minding the store?". This is the
>>>>> > second or third thing anyone interested in OFBiz sees...after the splash
>>>>> > page.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It's a mess of "stuff" that no one in their "right" (or "left") mind
>>>>> > would bother to spend too much time trying to decipher. Worst case: A
>>>>> > prospective user leaves the site (with a slight hint suggesting that
>>>>> > maybe the code is as disorganized as the web page) and downloads some
>>>>> > other project's code. Bye-bye prospect. Wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot
>>>>> > pole.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best case: A prospect user will end up downloading the trunk code,
>>>>> > because, on this web page, all roads lead to a trunk download. Then,
>>>>> > well how much fun is that going to be for a new user who doesn't have a
>>>>> > clue where to start? Bye-bye prospect. I tried, but code isn't stable
>>>>> > enough for my tastes.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > And some wonder why there isn't more OFBiz activity out there. Well, I
>>>>> > for one am pretty sure I know why.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> > Ruth
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>> > > Some ASF projects are very sucessful yet with strong competition, for
>>>>> > > instance ServiceMix vs Mule, Geronimo, vs..., etc.
>>>>> > > We may mimic some of the ways they are doing things. For instance,
>>>>> > > some time ago Chris Snow asked for a better SEO, I'm not quite sure
>>>>> > > but I think it'a about exporting the wiki and make Google (and other
>>>>> > > SEs) knows about it...
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Jacques
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>> > > Ruth, I'm sure there's some good that could come out of your message -
>>>>> > > so against my general nature of responding to this type of attitude,
>>>>> > > I'm going to try and help you phrase this in a way that will help us
>>>>> > > help infra to try to meet what you're looking for. Here's what I see
>>>>> > > when I go to the site(s):
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ - not downloading and
>>>>> > > testing anything - just looking at what I see:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > 1. The nightly trunk seems to be updated daily.
>>>>> > > 2. The 9.04 builds seem to, for some reason not be being updated on
>>>>> > > this page.
>>>>> > > 3. There aren't many 4.0 releases being built.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Then I go to here -
>>>>> > > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/archive/snapshots/ - and I see a
>>>>> > > slightly different picture:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > 1. The trunk builds aren't really archives they're simply another copy
>>>>> > > after it was moved over.
>>>>> > > -- The archives are there though from when HotWax was managing it.
>>>>> > > 2. The 9.04 builds seem to really be the ones that we'd want on that
>>>>> > > first page.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Now, since I know that this release and the downloads are super
>>>>> > > important to you, I'm really more interested in hearing you:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > 1. Lay out the way you'd like to see these pages work.
>>>>> > > 2. Even show some examples of other projects that you _do_ like
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I hope this helps Ruth - as Adrian and Jacopo mentioned, what you've
>>>>> > > sent here is just a whine, not a helpful way for anyone to improve.
>>>>> > > Put in the time and help us to make it more like you like and I'm sure
>>>>> > > you'll be more pleased with the result.  Btw, all of those other
>>>>> > > options are not the same type of community driven projects as the ASF,
>>>>> > > so it's hard to manage the same way.  When commercial interests are
>>>>> > > more intertwined with the project, there are definitely benefits (as
>>>>> > > well as drawbacks), so let's at least acknowledge those.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > Ruppert
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >> If there is a problem with the OFBiz site, it would be helpful to
>>>>> > >> know what it is. Remarks like this are not helpful.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> -Adrian
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>> > >>> This was meant as a sarcastic, "I can't believe this kind of thing
>>>>> > >>> keeps falling through the cracks", kind of remark. No wonder new
>>>>> > >>> users shy away. I mean, no wonder new users run as fast as their
>>>>> > >>> browsers will take them to OpenBravo, OpenERP, Magento...
>>>>> > >>> Regards,
>>>>> > >>> Ruth
>>>>> > >>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > >>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword
>>>>> > >>> "myofbiz"
>>>>> > >>> ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Matt Warnock <mwarn...@ridgecrestherbals.com>
>>>>> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to