That looks great - thanks Matt!

-Adrian

--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Matt Warnock <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Matt Warnock <[email protected]>
> Subject: Newbie Docs Overview [was Re: What I would like to see]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 11:36 PM
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 12:32 -0700,
> Tim Ruppert wrote: 
> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'm going to think on
> it this weekend and
> >  will try and come up with some ideas of how this
> could work better. 
> >  If you could show me some sites that you do
> like, that would be a big
> >  help - then I can see how to get that working in
> our world.
> 
> Based on your feedback and that of others, I have added a
> new outline
> page to the home page of the wiki at the following URL:
> 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Documentation+Overview
> 
> This contains the ordered overview I started and shared
> earlier.  I hope
> I haven't stepped on anyone's toes.  It isn't pretty,
> just wiki pages,
> but hopefully it helps the newbies like me.
> 
> I have started to add a couple of pages to flesh it out,
> but I know most
> of this stuff exists elsewhere.  I only added a couple
> 1) as proof of
> concept, so people could get a feel for what I am
> suggesting, and 2) to
> see how I need to link things both inside and outside the
> wiki (personal
> sandbox). I still have things to learn there.
> 
> I am really new to all this, so please, if 1) I have done
> something
> wrong, please advise, and 2) if I have done it right,
> please add the
> best links you know of to flesh out this index.  As I
> say, I know it is
> out there, but strewn all over, and I'd like to collect it
> up, if you
> can tell me where to find it.  In particular, if I am
> polluting the wiki
> namespace with this, please let me know what I should do
> differently.
> 
> I have tried to keep the stuff really succinct and clear
> from a newbie's
> point of view-- which I know only too clearly.  
> 
> -- 
> Matt Warnock <[email protected]>
> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.
> 
> 



Reply via email to