You just have to choose the right tool for the task at hand.
For the moment, I prefer minilang when it comes to deal with simple CRUD services and a bit more elaborated.
I agree that a groovy DSL could be a good thing though, I have just not enough
time to even think about it...
Jacques
From: "Christopher Snow" <[email protected]>
Hi Jacques, minilang is quick, but being xml it's verbose. Groovy
would be much more concise wouldn't it - especially if a DSL was created?
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
For the same reason Java is not used. Once you get a grasp on it you
understand why it's there: productivity.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Mini-Language+Guide#Mini-LanguageGuide-introduction
Jacques
From: "Christopher Snow" <[email protected]>
I was wondering why groovy is not used for service code instead on
minilang?
Any thoughts?
Many thanks,
Chris
