It would be good if someone can commited the following bug fix
Change from
> if (percScrapFactor.compareTo(bdHundred.negate()) > 0 &&
> percScrapFactor.compareTo(bdHundred.negate()) < 0) {
>
to
> if (percScrapFactor.compareTo(bdHundred.negate()) > 0 &&
> percScrapFactor.compareTo(bdHundred) < 0) {
>
Regards,
James
james_sg wrote:
>
>
>
>> if (percScrapFactor.compareTo(bdHundred.negate()) > 0 &&
>> percScrapFactor.compareTo(bdHundred.negate
>> ()) < 0)
>>
> When the above condition fails,
>
>
>> oneChildNode.setScrapFactor(percScrapFactor);
>>
> will set the scrap factor as 1, thus ignoring the original scrap factor
> value.
>
> This is a bug.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Scrap-Factor-tp1562477p1564712.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
