Hi David:
re: "role based security". Let me get back to you on that. It will take me some time to give details on this.

Thanks for asking.
Ruth
----------------------------------------------------
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
[email protected]


David E Jones wrote:
I really did just mean for this to be a brainstorming thread... so could we 
add? Yeah, I guess we could add/change/etc anything in theory. Whether these 
things happen or not is another question and issue altogether (or more 
importantly how they happen, I do believe there's a chance for anything).

Anyway, when say "role based security" what does that mean to you? Could you 
describe some scenarios you'd like to see supported and maybe what the configuration 
might look like?

-David


On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

Hi David:
Could we add something to help manage role based security? Roles, user's 
resources etc. all in one place? I don't mean within the Party component. Roles 
have just as much to do with resources as they do with users.
Regards,
Ruth
----------------------------------------------------
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz"
[email protected]


David E Jones wrote:
If you could change anything about the OFBiz framework (not related to a 
specific tier), what would it be? This could be about how OFBiz is deployed, 
how the tools fit together, how application components are written and 
organized, and so on.

All comments are welcome. If there is another tool you'd like to see used, please describe what you 
like about it (like "I've found the aspect oriented inversion of control approach nice because 
I can plugin all sorts of tools and the full life cycle of the tools are managed for me") 
instead of just mentioning the tool (like "let's use Spring!").

Why am I asking? This topic comes up every once in a while, and it's true that 
many suggestions never get enough support to actually happen (or on further 
research it is decided that the idea is not tenable), but brainstorming about 
them to get ideas in the open is still a great thing. The history of OFBiz is 
full of things like this where users and more casual contributors had ideas and 
saw possibilities that others, even more involved contributors, totally missed 
or never looked at that way. What I think would be fun, and ultimately useful 
too, is to keep this mostly to brainstorming and not do too much comparing of 
ideas.

BTW, if you want to brainstorm about one of the tiers (ie the Data, Logic, or 
UI tiers) please use the other threads on those.

-David




Reply via email to