The compatibility is much less of a concern between the providers add-on and 
the project - the problem will come early and often between two components - 
that was what I was alluding to.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:22 PM, ScottA wrote:

> 
> Tim,
> 
> I would think that it would have to go through testing to be compatible to
> each release and I'm not saying that it would have to be 100%. The releases
> are not but if the committer was not willing to test on a periodic basis,
> then it should be removed. I guess the question you are really asking is who
> would moderate such a thing and I think free enterprise would. If you buy
> the app and it does not work or it breaks, then you leave a review and the
> next guy is going to pass on the offering. 
> 
> I am sure OFBiz itself could be configured to run this. I'm not saying it
> would be perfect but why not give something a try to start with? I'm sure
> most of the long time guys here have something to offer. 
> 
> Ruth, I dont have any add-ons I want to sell. I'm a small business owner
> slowly building OfBiz out to meet my needs. The reason I asked this question
> is that I'm wondering what kind of add-ons have already been built by others
> that are not in the project themselves and which could benifit me.
> 
> BJ mentioned "we have many in the special purpose" but like I said earlier,
> as a non-technical user how would I know?
> 
> Thanks for the time.
> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://n4.nabble.com/Question-about-add-ons-tp1749458p1749711.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to