I believe I've said all I felt the need to say, you are of course free to proceed however you wish.
Regards Scott On 1/05/2010, at 1:28 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Scott: > > First, this mailing list is not about you posting your "beliefs" as regards > OFBiz or anything else. This mailing list is suppose to be for the > dissemination of facts concerning OFBIz. > > Second, What does charging a minimal fee have to do with this discussion? > > Third, and most importantly, I am contributing to OFBiz. I just don't have an > employer such as HotWax paying my way. That is why I have to charge for these > materials. I need to recoup the very real costs of items (such as server > hosting) other than my time. > > Regards, > Ruth > ---------------------------------------------------- > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > [email protected] > > > Scott Gray wrote: >> It's 1am here and I'm not working, I'm contributing to OFBiz and my request >> had nothing to do with my employer. >> >> Let's not forget that the material you're advertising isn't free. >> >> I don't have a problem with advertising but this is a discussion forum and I >> don't believe that your advertising emails do anything to further the >> discussion. How about saying something useful and then including your one >> liner? >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 1/05/2010, at 12:56 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> Thank you Heidi. >>> FYI, unlike the HotWax sponsored blogs and tutorials, there is nothing on >>> my site that advertises anything but how to get more information about >>> OFBiz. >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" >>> [email protected] >>> >>> Info Olagos wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> However, i find it a good thing to publish regularly the url from >>>> www.myofbiz.com . >>>> >>>> The documentation of ofbiz is a really difficult one to find exactly what >>>> you need. >>>> >>>> And at this url you immediately know where to find the information. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Heidi >>>> >>>> 2010/4/30 Scott Gray <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Ruth, >>>>> >>>>> This is bordering on spam and starting to get annoying, would you mind >>>>> trying to contribute to the discussion before starting in with the >>>>> advertising? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> On 1/05/2010, at 12:31 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello List: >>>>>> If anyone is interested in a more in-depth treatment of the Catalog >>>>>> >>>>> Manager, products, catalogs and categories, please see my book: "Getting >>>>> Started with Apache OFBiz, The Catalog Manager". You may purchase a copy >>>>> of >>>>> this at: http://www.myofbiz.com >>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Ruth >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Abernathy wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also am new to ofbiz and am trying to learn how to use it. I couldn't >>>>>>> >>>>> help noticing this discussion because I wanted to do the same thing - set >>>>> up >>>>> a hierarchy of categories for products. I was just going through the >>>>> business setup guide located at >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Apache+OFBiz+Business+Setup+Guideand >>>>> towards the end it discusses how to set up categories. I have a couple >>>>> of questions: >>>>> >>>>>>> -Can a category be used in more than one Catalog? >>>>>>> -Can a category have more than one parent? It looks like the answer is >>>>>>> >>>>> "no" but just making sure. >>>>> >>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> are you sure you are not referring to 1 million products. >>>>>>>> I run in the real world over 100,000 products. >>>>>>>> I have approx 18 top categories with 3-10 levels of sub categories. >>>>>>>> if your see 1,000,000 categories that way then it is feasible. >>>>>>>> I use automated updating from my suppliers to keep thing up-to-date. >>>>>>>> these updates happen every 24 for prices new and obsolete products. >>>>>>>> availability is as often as 15 min. >>>>>>>> The average Cpu usage during these operations is about 15% of a 1.6ghz >>>>>>>> Cpu with enough RAM to not use the swap file. the peak cpu usage is >>>>>>>> about 75% when the scheduled services and large imports (1 gig data) >>>>>>>> >>>>> are >>>>> >>>>>>>> happening. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ========================= >>>>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>>>> http://bjfreeman.elance.com >>>>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < >>>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>>>> Linkedin >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro >>>>> >>>>>>>> Michal Cukierman sent the following on 4/30/2010 1:51 AM: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you for your quick response. Regarding your question about real >>>>>>>>> >>>>> world >>>>> >>>>>>>>> applications: >>>>>>>>> Ecommerce: >>>>>>>>> http://www.rockauto.com/ >>>>>>>>> http://allegro.pl/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There are applications that holds > 1 000 000 categories. >>>>>>>>> In a PLM industry it's also very common to have a couple of milions of >>>>>>>>> objects (consider the complexity of a train or a plain for example). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The point of my post was not a fix, but the implementation of the >>>>>>>>> >>>>> find root >>>>> >>>>>>>>> category method. >>>>>>>>> I think that you should avoid such a code. You have got great database >>>>>>>>> >>>>> layer >>>>> >>>>>>>>> (great possibility to improve performance) so it would be great to >>>>>>>>> >>>>> utilize >>>>> >>>>>>>>> it as much as it's possible. >>>>>>>>> I really like Ofbiz application thats why I try to give you my input. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once again thank you for the response and for the link you send me. I >>>>>>>>> >>>>> will >>>>> >>>>>>>>> come back with the better solution after studing the datamodel. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Micha³ Cukierman >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> W dniu 30 kwietnia 2010 10:11 u¿ytkownik Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> napisa³: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For instanc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
