In Spain (and I think other countries of EU) uses a predefined hierarchical GL. If I create subaccounts will vulnerate the integrity of the PGC (Plan general contable) so I don't think that is the solution but I understand your comment. It will work for US with no doubt. In fact, it was impossible to understand what I wanted to say because I didn't put it in context. I continued an old topic last week talking about the integration of the spanish PGC to Ofbiz and this time I created a new one w/o a reference to the other.
Anyway I appreciate your input. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:49 PM, BJ Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > use a subaccount under the mains Tax Authority account, unless I don't > clearly understand your situation. > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < > http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > Linkedin > < > http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro > > > > > Jonatan Soto sent the following on 5/7/2010 8:11 AM: > > Hi list, > > > > I'm wonder why is not possible to define more GL Accounts for the same > > PartyID (in that case a Company) using the same Tax Authority. There are > a > > few GL Accounts in the spanish accounting used by the Tax Authority so I > > must do that. > > > > There is a note in > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/08.4+GL+Accountsregarding > > to this w/o a finally answer, so is there any side-effect if I > > change the DDL of TAX_AUTHORITY_GL_ACCOUNT in order to define a primary > key > > including the GL_ACCOUNT_ID? > > > > Regards. > > > > >
