Sounds right.  Thanks to all who helped and made suggestions.  I was
(and remain) over my head.  But at least it's running now. :)

-- 
Matt Warnock <[email protected]>
RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc.

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 12:10 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> I would then say it has to do with the code changes in the trunk like is
>    <Map<String, String>>
> debian open JDK does not cover this.
> 
> 
> =========================
> BJ Freeman
> http://bjfreeman.elance.com
> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation 
> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
> 
> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
> 
> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
> Linkedin
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
> 
> 
> Matt Warnock sent the following on 5/18/2010 9:54 AM:
> > Th problem appears to be openjdk-specific.
> > If after doing "apt-get install java-6-sun-jdk" I then run
> > "update-java-alternatives --list" I get three options:
> > java-6-openjdk 1061 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk
> > java-6-sun 63 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
> > java-gcj 1042 /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj
> > 
> > If I then run "update-java-alternatives --set java-6-sun"
> > then it compiles fine.  
> > 
> > If I change back with "update-java-alternatives --set java-6-openjdk" it
> > breaks again.  But 9.04 compiles fine under openjdk, like I said. Still
> > don't know what openjdk is missing on Debian stable, but the Sun java
> > package apparently supplies it.
> > 
> > BTW, just out of curiosity, what is the purpose of "./ant", and why
> > would it be needed?  It seems to set JAVA, look for an
> > "ant-launcher.jar" file (of which there are several in my system, but
> > none in this directory tree, should I worry?) and then launch java,
> > which I assume runs the ant application.  How is this different from
> > the /usr/bin/ant shell script, which seems to do a lot more, but in the
> > same general vein?  Is the ./ant just a quick-and-dirty version of the
> > same thing?  Is there a reason I should use one or the other?
> > 
> 

Reply via email to