>> write your service in groovy using standard java Yes, that is exactly what I said.
Regards Scott On 29/06/2010, at 3:48 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > as long as you use java only coding conventions non of the groovy conventions. > > Scott Gray sent the following on 6/28/2010 7:20 PM: > > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation > <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > Linkedin > <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> > >> I know you said not to mention groovy but you could always just write your >> service in groovy using standard java and then drop it into a java file when >> you're done. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 29/06/2010, at 1:46 PM, Muhammad Aamir wrote: >> >>> Actually I am aware of minilang and have used it earlier. The reason I want >>> to minimize the use of it (in addition to its limitation) is that I don't >>> want to release the source code of my application. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM, James McGill< >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Muhammad Aamir<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is minilang a complete replacement of Java language? >>>>> >>>> >>>> This is not the intention of Minilang. It's a matter of opinion as to >>>> whether Minilang is easier to maintain than the eqivalent Java. >>>> Minilang is excellent for much of the work that is commonly done in the >>>> service layer, especially simple create and update operations, getting >>>> lists >>>> using variables that are automatically bound from the context, checking >>>> permissions, etc. This kind of thing is very common in OFBiz, so there are >>>> numerous examples. >>>> >>>> Since you have<call-bsh> in minilang, you also have the option of using >>>> java grammar inline. There are plenty of things that are simple to do in >>>> Java that might be very difficult or impossible to do in Minilang, and in >>>> my >>>> opinion there are Minilang routines in the OFBiz distribution that appear >>>> to >>>> have gone through enough evolution, that they would be better, in the long >>>> run, ported to Java. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> James McGill >>>> Phoenix AZ >>>> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
