Hi Jacques,
My implementation is about leave management. Some part of it's functionality is
as follows :
- Appropriate leave balance data would be there for two basic types of
agreements (permanent and contractual)
- Agreements would be applied to employee/s and thereby he/she would
get some leave balance
- Whenever an employee creates new leave application, leave balance
would be checked.
- Depending on leave balance, leave application may or may not be
created
In short, I have implemented 'leave balance check' functionality.
Now, lets consider old data. We may find that different employees had
applied for different number of leaves in total(e.g. empl1 had applied for
40,empl2 had applied for 50 leaves till now ) . So when newly added
functionality would be applied to 'such old data' conflicts will be seen in
data (as you can not keep on creating new agreements specific to employee to
cop-up with no of leaves created by him/her)
Please suggest how to tackle this situation.
Thanks & regards,
Swapnil Sawant
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Help regarding migration services
Quick answer: this may help (examples)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/Revisions+Requiring+Data+Migration
Jacques
Swapnil Sawant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have following queries while writing migration service/s :
>
>
> 1. I have created two new rows in an existing entity. In this case,
> only exporting data to XML should be done ?
>
> 2. Functionality which I have implemented won't work with old data. In
> that case, how migration process should be carried
> out ?
>
> For example :
>
>
> - In my implementation, I am tracking leave applications against
> leave balance (i.e. before creating a leave application
> ,his/her current balance would be checked)
>
> - When an already approved leave is rejected, corresponding 'no of
> leaves'(calculated using a service) gets credited
> back to his/her balance
>
> - But,as per old data, there wont be any (stored) value for 'no of
> leaves'.
>
> - If at all I use above service (for calculating no of leaves from
> existing dates),it will give rise to inconsistency
> of data because 'calculated no of leaves' would not be calculated against
> some 'leave balance'
>
> Please guide me in this context.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Swapnil Sawant
>
> ________________________________
> This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the
> intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended
> recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the
> sender and delete it from your system.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended
recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or
disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system.
______________________________________________________________________