That sounds wonderful.

-Adrian

--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Sam Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Sam Hamilton <[email protected]>
> Subject: Using Drools to Help with Rules
> To: "user" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 8:12 PM
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I have been thinking about problems we are soon going to
> start facing in marketing our OFBiz website and some of them
> can be solved using a rules engine, this then spilled over
> into other departments once I had read through the Drools
> website and saw how powerful it could be once implemented
> inside OFBiz. 
> 
> I was thinking Drools http://jboss.org/drools/ as its ASL2 so
> we can have in trunk http://jboss.org/drools/downloads.html and also because
> of the GUI which could be plugged into OFBiz where ever we
> need rules - a few cool examples are here 
> http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/5.0.1.26597.FINAL/drools-introduction/html/ch02.html#d0e166
> and for the developers or data mining people using Birt etc
> they can use Eclipse. 
> 
> The uses I can think of right now are:
> 1. Sending emails to customers - similar to auto responders
> or triggered emails .
> 2. Stock reordering - allowing different stock to be
> treated differently depending on for example how fast its
> selling or out of which warehouse the most is shipped. 
> 3. Inserting marketing material into parcels - picking
> different customer segments and targeting them differently.
> 4. Shipping carrier upgrades / changes depending on either
> destination or price - like zappos do when they secretly
> upgrade customers to over night delivery.
> 5. Refunds to customers if something goes wrong (could
> automate some of the process) and then if its outside the
> rules it move to a human for review. 
> 
> The real aim is that I want to move the process of rule
> changing out of the programers hands and put them into
> technical business people so that we can make fast changes
> to the business all done by the business users. 
> 
> What does everyone else think?
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Sam
> 
> 


      

Reply via email to