How are you implementing your multi-threaded code? Your message doesn't provide 
enough information.

-Adrian

--- On Thu, 8/5/10, cqnunez <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: cqnunez <[email protected]>
> Subject: javolution.JavolutionError: Concurrent maps should be marked shared
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, August 5, 2010, 8:12 PM
> 
> We encountered the ff error when implementing multiple
> threads to process
> multiple orders. Any assistance would be much appreciated.
> Thanks.
> 
> ---- error report
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Service [getPartyAccountingPreferences] threw an unexpected
> exception/error
> Exception: javolution.JavolutionError
> Message: Concurrent maps should be marked shared
> ---- stack trace
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> javolution.JavolutionError: Concurrent maps should be
> marked shared
> javolution.util.FastMap.indexOf(Unknown Source)
> javolution.util.FastMap.unmapEntry(Unknown Source)
> javolution.util.FastMap.unmapEntry(Unknown Source)
> javolution.util.FastMap.removeEntry(Unknown Source)
> javolution.util.FastMap.remove(Unknown Source)
> org.ofbiz.entity.transaction.TransactionUtil.clearTransactionBeginStack(TransactionUtil.java:652)
> org.ofbiz.entity.transaction.TransactionUtil.suspend(TransactionUtil.java:337)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:294)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:213)
> org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java:162)
> org.ofbiz.service.ModelService.evalPermission(ModelService.java:959)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.checkAuth(ServiceDispatcher.java:892)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:342)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:213)
> org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java:162)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.callops.CallService.exec(CallService.java:244)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:921)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.ifops.IfEmpty.exec(IfEmpty.java:95)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:921)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:749)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.callops.CallSimpleMethod.exec(CallSimpleMethod.java:84)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:921)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:749)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java:149)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java:131)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:76)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java:51)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:384)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:213)
> org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java:162)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.callops.CallService.exec(CallService.java:244)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:921)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.ifops.IfEmpty.exec(IfEmpty.java:95)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:921)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.method.envops.Loop.exec(Loop.java:81)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:921)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:749)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java:149)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java:131)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:76)
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java:51)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:384)
> org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:213)
> org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java:148)
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/javolution-JavolutionError-Concurrent-maps-should-be-marked-shared-tp2315856p2315856.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> 


      

Reply via email to