Hi,

It was a problem with reverse dns. In fact, server was able to identify
the domain for my ip address, but it was set to ".".

Thanks for your help.


Dnia 2010-09-11, sob o godzinie 16:53 +0530, Ashish Vijaywargiya pisze:
> Hello Jeremiah,
> 
> For now I have reverted my changes from trunk at r996122 and will get
> back here with better fix.
> Please take update, it will work for you.
> 
> --
> Ashish
> 
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I will try to find better fix and will get back here in next week.
> >
> > --
> > Ashish
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Jeremiah Christensen <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> The recent change to UtilXml has caused me to be unable to use exported 
> >> services using jax-ws. The issue is that jax-ws adds namespace prefixes to 
> >> the element names. getNodeName returns the element name with the prefix; 
> >> whereas, getLocalName returns just the element name. So, getNodeName fails 
> >> for me when it's being compared to a string like "map-Key".
> >>
> >> Perhaps instead of replacing getLocalName with getNodeName, ofbiz could 
> >> 'or' them, looking for the possibility of both? After implementing this 
> >> locally, I am back in business. See attached patch.
> >>
> >> The change to UtilXml.java mentioned above (from ViewSVN):
> >> <snip>
> >> Revision 995384 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
> >> Modified Thu Sep 9 11:32:28 2010 UTC (31 hours, 44 minutes ago) by ashish
> >> File length: 47184 byte(s)
> >> Diff to previous 995202 (colored)
> >> Fixing bug of reading node name. When we read first child element of the 
> >> response of any third party integration for example ups etc, node name 
> >> can't be read using "node.getLocalName()". So changing  
> >> node.getLocalName() --> node.getNodeName().
> >>
> >> Thanks Vivek for the contribution.
> >> </snip>
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Jeremiah Christensen
> >> Web Services Engineer
> >> PACE Anti-Piracy, Inc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >

Reply via email to