thank for the replies. 1) From my perspective this is not an ERP,but a core that has layered applications for 52(so far) different markets. This is not on my own, have a group from local colleges, I have been training my way. However those with an ofbiz back ground, and a NDA will be ask to work on section, for pay, as the resources are needed.
3)hope and aspiration of being a large corporation. done it before, so confident can do it again. As David Said, my contribution are flawed. and it really is like going up hill when all I wanted was to share so everyone could benefit. On top of that I am use to a environment where everything is tested before submitted, which as many have said, they, as volunteers, do not see a reason to have project management. 5) when it comes down to linking the assemblers, anyone contributing on for a new cpu not in the library will be given an non exclusive license for that CPU. the proof of tests suite, of course. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Hans Bakker sent the following on 3/1/2011 6:01 PM: > Hi BJ, > > not sure if this is good for you or your customers or OFBiz? > Why? > 1. maintain an ERP system on your own? > 3. How about your customers? ERP system supported by a single operation? > 4. OFBiz looses one of its most active supporters? > 5. No contribution? I am sure people in the ofbiz community will be > interested in this compiler? > > I think you should reconsider..... > > Regards, > Hans > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 05:51 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote: >> what drew me to ofbiz is: >> 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so >> portable. >> 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script >> 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script >> 4)ui tied to the entities >> 5)using xsd to define the widgets >> >> however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am >> re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. >> I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. >> so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can >> contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. >> >> we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into >> machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow >> developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. >> >> ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my >> dues for the core code I am using. >> >> >> I wish you well. >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> >
