Ho, it should run on trunk, I used r1055454. I will try to see the status tomorrow morning... The Jira was almost done but I got very busy since then...

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[email protected]>
Nothing is impossible.

I would be interested in taking a look at it - even if it doesn't run on the 
current trunk.

-Adrian

On 4/6/2011 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hé wait Adrian, during fall I have already re-written their Funambol module, 
with doc ready and all. It's just that I have not
enough time to publish it on Jira (was done for previous client in a custom 
app). I just need to test it again in OFBiz OOTB...

If you are interested there is only one point I could not handle (and I think 
it's impossible)
https://core.forge.funambol.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=405&dsMessageId=139101

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <[email protected]>
Opentaps going with Hibernate (and Spring) was a useless effort, in my opinion.

Coincidentally, I'm currently working on rewriting their Funambol module so it 
will run on plain OFBiz, and I can assure you,
adding those technologies does nothing more than make a simple task 
unnecessarily complicated.

OFBiz has the ability to generate UI artifacts from the database.

-Adrian


On 4/5/2011 5:57 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Adrian,

Evalutating other technologies and how I can utilize them and combine
them with ofbiz database is not a waste of time, like you claim.

There are technologies available that allow us to generate data model,
and services from the database, and leave us with only UI to create. Some 
frameworks
like isis may even create the UI using naked objects, from the database.

I wanted to see how far I can go, generating JPA entities using ofbiz database.
That's why I wanted to name an id "id", and make it an integer.

This is not useless effort. Opentaps, have gone with hibernate already !

I trully value your advice about how to use my time productively.


On Tue Apr 05,2011 09:24 pm, Adrian Crum wrote:
Huh? What does Isis have to do with OFBiz?

-Adrian

On 4/5/2011 5:19 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/isis/


On Tue Apr 05,2011 08:18 pm, Adrian Crum wrote:
Why would you want to do that? It would result in rewriting the entire
project to change the field names.

It seems to me you will be wasting a lot of time trying to make OFBiz
code look the way you want it to look - without adding anything new or
fixing anything. Instead, why not use the project in the way it was
intended, and spend your time getting something useful accomplished?

-Adrian

On 4/5/2011 4:13 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Thank you all. I understand now the reasons behind using VARCHAR.

I found my way around this. I can just change the data type in the
fieldtypepostnew.xml. This way I can declare all the ids as integers,
and indicators as boolean instead of CHAR(1).

However still wondering if there is a way to change the name of the ids
to only id without having to go through each foriegn key.



On Mon Apr 04,2011 05:08 am, David E Jones wrote:
As for naming all "id" fields just plain "id", it makes it far more difficult to keep track of foreign keys. The nice thing about giving even sequenced ID fields a somewhat unique name is that you can use that same name on other entities/tables and
have them match up automatically.

The Entity Engine does a lot with field name mapping for relationships between entities, and there are thousands of these in
the OFBiz data model, so the few extra characters goes a long way toward making 
things easier to understand and maintain.

-David


On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:

Le 03/04/2011 06:15, Mansour Al Akeel a ?crit :
Hello all,

I am wondering about the reasons behind using VARCHAR for entities Id,
instead of a numeric value with autoincrement. Another thing is the
naming of the primary key. For example, accommodation_class has it's
primary key as "accommodation_class_id". Wouldn't it be easier just to
name it "id"?





Hi Mansour,

just go to this page : http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Why-primary-keys-are-VAR-CHAR-type-in-OFBiz-td146555.html#a146562

Cheers,

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz




Reply via email to