The websiteId in the web.xml files was a good information to have... (I mean to
know that it can be used from there)
Jacques
From: "Hans Bakker" <[email protected]>
Ok I did some more study...
the website records are not required unless a related productStore is
required.
we even could go that far to say that the websiteId in the web.xml is
not required if the WebSite record is removed.
Further I do not see a relation between Tenant and WebSite
Nothing to do with general properties, what i said earlier, in there is
the VISUAL_THEME and not the VISUAL_THEME_SET
So let me know if somebody had any other objections removing the Website
record in all backend webapps.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:19 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote:
I looked in the emaillist history and the only reason that came up is
the definition of the theme. (i missed that thread)
However,
most webapps are backend applications which can use the general
properties file when the website record is missing.
The reason i want it removed is that in a production environment the
website list is pretty long so it is difficult to find a website which
is really used.
Therefore my proposal to remove the website records for all back end
webapplications and the trunk front end should be demo data.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:11 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> I ask this on the Dev a few months ago, Erwan de FERRIERES told me this
> is why.
> I am assuming that in a tenant mode this adds more flexibility.
>
> Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/1/2011 10:52 PM:
> > We have a default theme in general.properties so website record not
> > mandatory?
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:19 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> >> <WebSite webSiteId="MARKETING" siteName="Marketing Manager"
> >> visualThemeSetId="BACKOFFICE"/>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/1/2011 8:38 PM:
> >>> We are now using the content part of the system more and more and are
> >>> wondering why every webapp has its website?
> >>>
> >>> I deleted in webtools the website for accounting and everything seems to
> >>> be still working ok.
> >>>
> >>> If there are no good reasons to keep it i would like to suggest to
> >>> remove all these websites except for cmssite, WebStore and WebStoreClone
> >>> and move these to the demo data.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Hans
> >>>
> >
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
