I will wait, but from your answer, I don't see that the partyrealtionship being considered.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/30/2011 9:32 PM: > my comments inline.... > > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 11:39 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote: >> Just checking: >> So and employee (party.PartyType relation.name =PARTY_PTY_TYP) with a >> Party.From.PartyRelationship.From.RoleType=CONTRACTOR will be able to >> Select the Organization Party >> (party.PartyType=Person,Oganization,PartyGroup,ContractingCompany) of >> the contracting company? >> If so you could not find the Departments of the Company >> (party.PartyType=InternalOrganization) >> >> I would like HR to be revisted as to its whole Structure. >> Having the PartyRelationship be the driving criteria. >> with Organization to organization, person to organization, person to >> person, covered. > > this is already happening and if you wait a bit, you can set up the > organization in the HR main screen tree. You can then also assign a > position to a party in the role internal organization. > >> >> once those were defined then departments for the from and to >> organization can be defined. >> >> BTW thanks for using the Tree for UI. I am only sad that the Tree widget >> is not worked on to accomplish this. >> >> Be glad to go into more depth about this in a Jira if you want to start one. >> >> Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/29/2011 10:38 PM: >>> Hi! >>> >>> we are at the moment improving the HR tree in the main screen to show >>> the data organization better and make the component easier to use.... >>> >>> Now your question: >>> If you go to employee position and create a new one you will see that >>> you have have to specify a partyId three fields from the top. We should >>> probably change the name of this field to organization partyId because >>> here is where you specify the department. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hans >>> >
